https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112759
YunQiang Su changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112759
--- Comment #8 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-13 branch has been updated by YunQiang Su :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:63df799074351e9b3ab90f5b3031ba2691385af8
commit r13-8175-g63df799074351e9b3ab90f5b3031ba2691385af8
Author: YunQiang Su
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112759
--- Comment #7 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by YunQiang Su :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:384dbb0b4e751e6eb7ba3f9993a6cce466743926
commit r14-6811-g384dbb0b4e751e6eb7ba3f9993a6cce466743926
Author: YunQiang Su
Date: Tue
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112759
--- Comment #6 from YunQiang Su ---
ohh, it should be concat(" ", NULL);
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112759
--- Comment #5 from YunQiang Su ---
It's my fault.
I misunderstanding `reconcat`:
if `optr` is NULL, it cannot work as the `s1` at the sametime.
If so, the return string will be empty.
So, let's define and initial ret like this:
char *ret =
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112759
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112759
--- Comment #3 from matoro ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #2)
> Hmm, looks like it is this part of the change:
> + if (cpu)
> +ret = reconcat (ret, ret, "-m", argv[0], "=", cpu, NULL);
>
> - return concat ("-m", argv[0],
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112759
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |13.3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112759
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[13 regression] mips|[13/14 regression] mips
