--- Comment #6 from fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-09-05 14:14
---
Subject: Bug 41024
Author: fxcoudert
Date: Sat Sep 5 14:14:28 2009
New Revision: 151450
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=151450
Log:
PR target/41024
* config/i386/mingw-w64.
--- Comment #5 from ktietz at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-09-05 13:14 ---
> I am retesting it. I think {v:-v} is better here.
This patch works fine. Could you post a patch for it. It is pre-approved.
Thanks,
Kai
Index: mingw-w64.h
=
--- Comment #4 from ktietz at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-09-05 11:20 ---
(In reply to comment #3)
> (In reply to comment #2)
> > Ok, could you sent a patch for it. It is pre-approved by me.
>
> I can't test it, have you?
>
I am retesting it. I think {v:-v} is better here.
--
http:/
--- Comment #3 from fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-09-05 10:14
---
(In reply to comment #2)
> Ok, could you sent a patch for it. It is pre-approved by me.
I can't test it, have you?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41024
--- Comment #2 from ktietz at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-09-05 10:02 ---
(In reply to comment #1)
> It's because of this in gcc/config/i386/mingw-w64.h:
>
> #define ASM_SPEC "%{v:-V} %{n} %{T} %{Ym,*} %{Yd,*} \
> %{Wa,*:%*} %{m32:--32} %{m64:--64}"
>
>
> The "%{v:-V}" part is what's tr
--- Comment #1 from fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-09-03 14:40
---
It's because of this in gcc/config/i386/mingw-w64.h:
#define ASM_SPEC "%{v:-V} %{n} %{T} %{Ym,*} %{Yd,*} \
%{Wa,*:%*} %{m32:--32} %{m64:--64}"
The "%{v:-V}" part is what's triggering what you see. Now, the que
