--- Comment #6 from manu at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-02-23 10:44 ---
Patch: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2010-02/msg00915.html
--
manu at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #5 from manu at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-02-22 09:02 ---
Testing a patch to deprecated -b and -V.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42485
--
jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.4.3 |4.4.4
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42485
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42485
--- Comment #4 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-12-31 15:41 ---
I'm fine with deprecating -V - anyone care to send a patch?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42485
--- Comment #3 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-12-30 00:07 ---
(In reply to comment #2)
(In reply to comment #1)
wouldn't it be better to deprecate the -V switch altogether?
Well it works on the trunk ...
I am wrong. And it is useful thing for GCC developers really.
