http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47137
--- Comment #13 from Jie Zhang jiez at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-01-04 10:21:29
UTC ---
Author: jiez
Date: Tue Jan 4 10:21:27 2011
New Revision: 168459
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=168459
Log:
PR driver/47137
* gcc.c
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47137
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47137
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47137
H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
URL|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47137
--- Comment #9 from joseph at codesourcery dot com joseph at codesourcery dot
com 2011-01-03 13:54:28 UTC ---
Does reverting the r168407 commit and instead applying Jie's first patch
from http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2010-12/msg00517.html fix all
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47137
--- Comment #10 from hjl at gcc dot gnu.org hjl at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-01-03
15:03:08 UTC ---
Author: hjl
Date: Mon Jan 3 15:03:05 2011
New Revision: 168429
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=168429
Log:
Revert revision
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47137
Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47137
--- Comment #12 from Ian Lance Taylor ian at airs dot com 2011-01-03 23:31:29
UTC ---
Sorry, it was Joseph, not Jakub, who mentioned the patch.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47137
Ian Lance Taylor ian at airs dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ian at airs dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47137
--- Comment #3 from hjl at gcc dot gnu.org hjl at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-01-02
17:54:24 UTC ---
Author: hjl
Date: Sun Jan 2 17:54:22 2011
New Revision: 168407
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=168407
Log:
Don't check have_o when
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47137
H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47137
H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47137
--- Comment #6 from Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-01-02
22:43:38 UTC ---
Yes, flag_wpa is not set (as I said) for non-WHOPR mode. We don't have a
flag to identify non-WHOPR link-time.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47137
H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47137
--- Comment #2 from H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com 2010-12-31 20:26:43
UTC ---
The proposed patch is at
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2010-12/msg00517.html
15 matches
Mail list logo