[Bug fortran/100551] [11/12 Regression] Passing return value of intrinsic to class(*) dummy argument can cause segfaults

2022-01-07 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100551 --- Comment #9 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Harald Anlauf : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:6a3018a4064b39a418d95c32e45fe7d6ad17ebf3 commit r10-10384-g6a3018a4064b39a418d95c32e45fe7d6ad17ebf3 Author: Harald Anlauf

[Bug fortran/100551] [11/12 Regression] Passing return value of intrinsic to class(*) dummy argument can cause segfaults

2021-05-25 Thread anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100551 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED

[Bug fortran/100551] [11/12 Regression] Passing return value of intrinsic to class(*) dummy argument can cause segfaults

2021-05-25 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100551 --- Comment #7 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Harald Anlauf : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:de55a48960d2f08266cba1222e233507015dd620 commit r11-8469-gde55a48960d2f08266cba1222e233507015dd620 Author: Harald Anlauf

[Bug fortran/100551] [11/12 Regression] Passing return value of intrinsic to class(*) dummy argument can cause segfaults

2021-05-23 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100551 --- Comment #6 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Harald Anlauf : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:fe03f4fc9548b3fdbff3c8284a994feaa7d6307d commit r12-1005-gfe03f4fc9548b3fdbff3c8284a994feaa7d6307d Author: Harald Anlauf Date:

[Bug fortran/100551] [11/12 Regression] Passing return value of intrinsic to class(*) dummy argument can cause segfaults

2021-05-20 Thread anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100551 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

[Bug fortran/100551] [11/12 Regression] Passing return value of intrinsic to class(*) dummy argument can cause segfaults

2021-05-13 Thread anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100551 --- Comment #4 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org --- Playing with the testcase show that the patch in comment#3 is incomplete. Next try: diff --git a/gcc/fortran/trans-expr.c b/gcc/fortran/trans-expr.c index cce18d094a6..3de53009970 100644 ---

[Bug fortran/100551] [11/12 Regression] Passing return value of intrinsic to class(*) dummy argument can cause segfaults

2021-05-12 Thread anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100551 --- Comment #3 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org --- Below fixes this PR and does not break the other testcase: diff --git a/gcc/fortran/trans-expr.c b/gcc/fortran/trans-expr.c index cce18d094a6..ebc9ea42beb 100644 --- a/gcc/fortran/trans-expr.c

[Bug fortran/100551] [11/12 Regression] Passing return value of intrinsic to class(*) dummy argument can cause segfaults

2021-05-12 Thread anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100551 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||wrong-code

[Bug fortran/100551] [11/12 Regression] Passing return value of intrinsic to class(*) dummy argument can cause segfaults

2021-05-12 Thread marxin at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100551 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2021-05-12

[Bug fortran/100551] [11/12 Regression] Passing return value of intrinsic to class(*) dummy argument can cause segfaults

2021-05-12 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100551 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |11.2 Priority|P3