[Bug fortran/102366] [10/11/12 Regression] large arrays no longer become static

2021-09-21 Thread anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102366 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED

[Bug fortran/102366] [10/11/12 Regression] large arrays no longer become static

2021-09-21 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102366 --- Comment #17 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Harald Anlauf : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:d3db5b1d23cbe4e4569e688a6dbc8b5b2c38588e commit r10-10140-gd3db5b1d23cbe4e4569e688a6dbc8b5b2c38588e Author: Harald

[Bug fortran/102366] [10/11/12 Regression] large arrays no longer become static

2021-09-21 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102366 --- Comment #16 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Harald Anlauf : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:7fbab3afca910c055676ebc566bf87c4d5a7372f commit r11-9020-g7fbab3afca910c055676ebc566bf87c4d5a7372f Author: Harald Anlauf

[Bug fortran/102366] [10/11/12 Regression] large arrays no longer become static

2021-09-17 Thread anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102366 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

[Bug fortran/102366] [10/11/12 Regression] large arrays no longer become static

2021-09-17 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102366 --- Comment #14 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Harald Anlauf : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:51166eb2c534692c3c7779def24f83c8c3811b98 commit r12-3639-g51166eb2c534692c3c7779def24f83c8c3811b98 Author: Harald Anlauf Date:

[Bug fortran/102366] [10/11/12 Regression] large arrays no longer become static

2021-09-17 Thread anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102366 --- Comment #13 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org --- In decl.c:match_attr_spec we have: 5818 /* Since Fortran 2008 module variables implicitly have the SAVE attribute. */ 5819 if ((gfc_current_state () == COMP_MODULE 5820 ||

[Bug fortran/102366] [10/11/12 Regression] large arrays no longer become static

2021-09-17 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102366 --- Comment #12 from Jakub Jelinek --- That LGTM, except formatting - && shouldn't be at the end of line per coding conventions, but on the start of next line.

[Bug fortran/102366] [10/11/12 Regression] large arrays no longer become static

2021-09-17 Thread anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102366 --- Comment #11 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to Dominique d'Humieres from comment #10) > The problem is gone if I revert r12-3129. But then it regresses on pr98411. See for yourself compiling with -Wall. Something like diff

[Bug fortran/102366] [10/11/12 Regression] large arrays no longer become static

2021-09-17 Thread dominiq at lps dot ens.fr via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102366 --- Comment #10 from Dominique d'Humieres --- > Seems it changed with r12-3129-gf95946afd160e2a1f4beac4ee5e6d5633307f39a The problem is gone if I revert r12-3129.

[Bug fortran/102366] [10/11/12 Regression] large arrays no longer become static

2021-09-16 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102366 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[10/11/12 Regression] |[10/11/12 Regression] large