https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102787
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102787
--- Comment #14 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Harald Anlauf
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:1f49f2ad78360ea6634deca9a8cc35f9c4f1051d
commit r10-10334-g1f49f2ad78360ea6634deca9a8cc35f9c4f1051d
Author: Harald Anlauf
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102787
--- Comment #13 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Harald Anlauf
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:217d8bf22b148ebe52456a4bccfe9d725e7c68e9
commit r11-9359-g217d8bf22b148ebe52456a4bccfe9d725e7c68e9
Author: Harald Anlauf
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102787
--- Comment #12 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org ---
*** Bug 103263 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102787
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||gs...@t-online.de
--- Commen
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102787
--- Comment #10 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Harald Anlauf :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:6b8ecbc6d6652d061d7c72c64352d51eca2df6ca
commit r12-5639-g6b8ecbc6d6652d061d7c72c64352d51eca2df6ca
Author: Harald Anlauf
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102787
--- Comment #9 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to anlauf from comment #8)
> Simpler and better patch which handles array sections as well as vector
> subscripts:
@Bill: does this patch or the submitted one in
https://gcc.gnu.org/pi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102787
--- Comment #8 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Simpler and better patch which handles array sections as well as vector
subscripts:
diff --git a/gcc/fortran/array.c b/gcc/fortran/array.c
index 6552eaf3b0c..f870c225195 100644
--- a/gcc/fortran/
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102787
--- Comment #7 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Slightly improved version of the patch of comment#6:
diff --git a/gcc/fortran/array.c b/gcc/fortran/array.c
index 6552eaf3b0c..a63a6631f59 100644
--- a/gcc/fortran/array.c
+++ b/gcc/fortran/array
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102787
--- Comment #6 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org ---
WIP patch that fixes comment#5 as like comment#0 and regtests cleanly:
diff --git a/gcc/fortran/array.c b/gcc/fortran/array.c
index 6552eaf3b0c..e1ab2e06fdb 100644
--- a/gcc/fortran/array.c
+++ b
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102787
--- Comment #5 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Looks like an issue with simplification of array within array constructor:
print *, - a
print *, - [a]
print *, - [[a]]
end
-fdump-fortran-original produces:
code:
WRITE UNIT=6 FMT
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102787
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102787
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102787
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[12 regression] ICE in new |ICE in new test case
14 matches
Mail list logo