https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105243
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Target
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105243
--- Comment #15 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Harald Anlauf
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:290147c4c8e3d9d1f13297b511d3a0afb5e952d4
commit r10-10882-g290147c4c8e3d9d1f13297b511d3a0afb5e952d4
Author: Harald
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105243
--- Comment #14 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Harald Anlauf
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:5c293d9abc4b14e987a574fc11666809a2b8b8da
commit r11-10107-g5c293d9abc4b14e987a574fc11666809a2b8b8da
Author: Harald
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105243
--- Comment #13 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-12 branch has been updated by Harald Anlauf
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:d870ce1a112c0cbdff6172346a4a164503d92573
commit r12-8544-gd870ce1a112c0cbdff6172346a4a164503d92573
Author: Harald Anlauf
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105243
--- Comment #12 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Harald Anlauf :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:4c233cabbe388a6b8957c1507e129090e9267ceb
commit r13-1370-g4c233cabbe388a6b8957c1507e129090e9267ceb
Author: Harald Anlauf
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105243
--- Comment #11 from Steve Kargl ---
On Wed, Jun 29, 2022 at 07:42:30PM +, anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
>
> when using your patch from comment#2 and moving it up slightly, it will
> also improve error handling for unlimited polymorphic
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105243
--- Comment #10 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Submitted: https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/fortran/2022-June/057972.html
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105243
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |anlauf at gcc dot
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105243
--- Comment #8 from Steve Kargl ---
On Tue, May 17, 2022 at 07:56:18PM +, anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105243
>
> --- Comment #7 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org ---
> (In reply to Steve
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105243
--- Comment #7 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Steve Kargl from comment #6)
> > I quoted the F2018 standard constraint.
> >
> > C708 An entity declared with the CLASS keyword shall be a dummy
> > argument or have the
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105243
--- Comment #6 from Steve Kargl ---
On Mon, May 16, 2022 at 10:16:51PM +, sgk at troutmask dot
apl.washington.edu wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105243
>
> --- Comment #5 from Steve Kargl ---
> On Mon, May 16, 2022
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105243
--- Comment #5 from Steve Kargl ---
On Mon, May 16, 2022 at 08:27:24PM +, anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105243
>
> --- Comment #3 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org ---
> (In reply to kargl
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105243
--- Comment #4 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to anlauf from comment #3)
> F2018 has:
>
> C850 An entity with the PARAMETER attribute shall not be a variable, a
> coarray, or a procedure.
Or we see here an disagreement between
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105243
--- Comment #3 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to kargl from comment #2)
> This fixes the problem. Someone that regularly use git will need to commit
> it.
Are you sure this is the right solution?
Consider:
program p
type t
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105243
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105243
G. Steinmetz changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-invalid-code
--- Comment #1 from
16 matches
Mail list logo
