[Bug fortran/109641] Gfortran fails to overload intrinsic operator (*) if operands are complex. It works with real ones.

2023-05-18 Thread adelson.oliveira at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109641 --- Comment #19 from Adelson Oliveira --- Thank you all Em qui., 18 de mai. de 2023 às 14:01, anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org < gcc-bugzi...@gcc.gnu.org> escreveu: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109641 > > anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug fortran/109641] Gfortran fails to overload intrinsic operator (*) if operands are complex. It works with real ones.

2023-05-18 Thread anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109641 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Target

[Bug fortran/109641] Gfortran fails to overload intrinsic operator (*) if operands are complex. It works with real ones.

2023-05-18 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109641 --- Comment #17 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-13 branch has been updated by Harald Anlauf : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:611be07e48956c8b7371eb580eef124990114fd3 commit r13-7353-g611be07e48956c8b7371eb580eef124990114fd3 Author: Harald Anlauf

[Bug fortran/109641] Gfortran fails to overload intrinsic operator (*) if operands are complex. It works with real ones.

2023-05-05 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109641 --- Comment #16 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Harald Anlauf : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:185da7c2014ba41f38dd62cc719873ebf020b076 commit r14-529-g185da7c2014ba41f38dd62cc719873ebf020b076 Author: Harald Anlauf Date:

[Bug fortran/109641] Gfortran fails to overload intrinsic operator (*) if operands are complex. It works with real ones.

2023-05-01 Thread anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109641 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

[Bug fortran/109641] Gfortran fails to overload intrinsic operator (*) if operands are complex. It works with real ones.

2023-04-30 Thread adelson.oliveira at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109641 --- Comment #14 from Adelson Oliveira --- Ok, thanks. Em sáb., 29 de abr. de 2023 11:55 PM, escreveu: > Attachments with a MIME type of "text/html" are not allowed on this > installation. > > Adelson Oliveira wrote: > > Thanks, anlauf > > >

[Bug fortran/109641] Gfortran fails to overload intrinsic operator (*) if operands are complex. It works with real ones.

2023-04-29 Thread adelson.oliveira at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109641 --- Comment #13 from Adelson Oliveira --- Thanks, anlauf Em sáb., 29 de abr. de 2023 às 16:00, anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org < gcc-bugzi...@gcc.gnu.org> escreveu: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109641 > > --- Comment #12 from

[Bug fortran/109641] Gfortran fails to overload intrinsic operator (*) if operands are complex. It works with real ones.

2023-04-29 Thread anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109641 --- Comment #12 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to Adelson Oliveira from comment #11) > I'm a linux user and gfortran comes with my distro. I mean, I did not > compile gcc. > Is this patch still to be tested? Am I expected to do

[Bug fortran/109641] Gfortran fails to overload intrinsic operator (*) if operands are complex. It works with real ones.

2023-04-28 Thread adelson.oliveira at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109641 --- Comment #11 from Adelson Oliveira --- I'm a linux user and gfortran comes with my distro. I mean, I did not compile gcc. Is this patch still to be tested? Am I expected to do something to test it? Or I just wait until a new gfortran version

[Bug fortran/109641] Gfortran fails to overload intrinsic operator (*) if operands are complex. It works with real ones.

2023-04-28 Thread anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109641 --- Comment #10 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org --- Created attachment 54954 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=54954=edit Patch (2nd try) This one works and regtests ok.

[Bug fortran/109641] Gfortran fails to overload intrinsic operator (*) if operands are complex. It works with real ones.

2023-04-27 Thread sgk at troutmask dot apl.washington.edu via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109641 --- Comment #9 from Steve Kargl --- On Fri, Apr 28, 2023 at 01:37:48AM +, adelson.oliveira at gmail dot com wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109641 > > --- Comment #8 from Adelson Oliveira --- > Then I should have

[Bug fortran/109641] Gfortran fails to overload intrinsic operator (*) if operands are complex. It works with real ones.

2023-04-27 Thread adelson.oliveira at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109641 --- Comment #8 from Adelson Oliveira --- Then I should have defined the operations with double precision as well?

[Bug fortran/109641] Gfortran fails to overload intrinsic operator (*) if operands are complex. It works with real ones.

2023-04-27 Thread adelson.oliveira at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109641 --- Comment #7 from Adelson Oliveira --- (In reply to kargl from comment #6) > (In reply to Adelson Oliveira from comment #5) > > (In reply to anlauf from comment #2) > > > Replacing the first argument of > > > > > > FUNCTION MULTc4(v,m) > >

[Bug fortran/109641] Gfortran fails to overload intrinsic operator (*) if operands are complex. It works with real ones.

2023-04-27 Thread kargl at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109641 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||kargl at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug fortran/109641] Gfortran fails to overload intrinsic operator (*) if operands are complex. It works with real ones.

2023-04-27 Thread adelson.oliveira at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109641 --- Comment #5 from Adelson Oliveira --- (In reply to anlauf from comment #2) > Replacing the first argument of > > FUNCTION MULTc4(v,m) > REAL,INTENT(IN) :: v(:) > > by > > complex, INTENT(IN) :: v(:) > > makes the code

[Bug fortran/109641] Gfortran fails to overload intrinsic operator (*) if operands are complex. It works with real ones.

2023-04-27 Thread anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109641 --- Comment #4 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to anlauf from comment #3) > Untested patch: Unfortunately this regresses on many testcases :-(

[Bug fortran/109641] Gfortran fails to overload intrinsic operator (*) if operands are complex. It works with real ones.

2023-04-27 Thread anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109641 --- Comment #3 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org --- Untested patch: diff --git a/gcc/fortran/expr.cc b/gcc/fortran/expr.cc index 02028f993fd..d70b4872162 100644 --- a/gcc/fortran/expr.cc +++ b/gcc/fortran/expr.cc @@ -986,6 +986,14 @@

[Bug fortran/109641] Gfortran fails to overload intrinsic operator (*) if operands are complex. It works with real ones.

2023-04-27 Thread anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109641 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||accepts-invalid --- Comment

[Bug fortran/109641] Gfortran fails to overload intrinsic operator (*) if operands are complex. It works with real ones.

2023-04-27 Thread anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109641 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Keywords|