https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110288
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110288
--- Comment #10 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Harald Anlauf
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:a348245bfb018f02b36d22575380b34aef58f52c
commit r11-10910-ga348245bfb018f02b36d22575380b34aef58f52c
Author: Harald
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110288
--- Comment #9 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-12 branch has been updated by Harald Anlauf
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:995c717500c368c5aec7889dfa047cff7cb0139b
commit r12-9773-g995c717500c368c5aec7889dfa047cff7cb0139b
Author: Harald Anlauf
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110288
--- Comment #8 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-13 branch has been updated by Harald Anlauf
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:447dd2924e43884d798d8c40765cbfddd0fde0ae
commit r13-7564-g447dd2924e43884d798d8c40765cbfddd0fde0ae
Author: Harald Anlauf
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110288
--- Comment #7 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org ---
The fix for FINDLOC also fixes the same regression for MINLOC, MAXLOC.
There is another issue for MINVAL and MAXVAL that exists already in
10-branch, thus not a regression. I get at runtime:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110288
--- Comment #6 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Harald Anlauf :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:3b2c523ae31b68fc3b8363b458a55eec53a44365
commit r14-2439-g3b2c523ae31b68fc3b8363b458a55eec53a44365
Author: Harald Anlauf
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110288
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |anlauf at gcc dot
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110288
--- Comment #4 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org ---
The patch in comment#3 tries to fix a symptom and is wrong. The true cause
is the attempt to derive the formal argument typespec from the actual for
intrinsics. This mistreats character, as the
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110288
--- Comment #3 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org ---
The apparent discrepancy between fndecl and the actual arguments in the call
may be a result from the following block in gfc_conv_procedure_call after:
7390 /* Deferred length dummies
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110288
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110288
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||wrong-code
11 matches
Mail list logo