https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115107
--- Comment #18 from Jakub Jelinek ---
(In reply to Natalie Perlin from comment #17)
> Brief note on the errors is below. Does it need to be submitted as a
> separate ticket/different bug?
Yes.
> I'd prepare a preprocessed file where the error
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115107
--- Comment #17 from Natalie Perlin ---
anl...@gcc.gnu.org - Thank you for you comment on the new compiler version/new
bug (to file a separate report for gnu/14.1.0)
It turns out, however, that other packages from the software stack collection
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115107
--- Comment #16 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Natalie Perlin from comment #15)
> Quick update:
>
> Software stack and model build with gnu/13.3.0 was clear from all previous
> issues! So issue with the gnu/13.x.0 compiler coul
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115107
--- Comment #15 from Natalie Perlin ---
Quick update:
Software stack and model build with gnu/13.3.0 was clear from all previous
issues! So issue with the gnu/13.x.0 compiler could be considered as fixed,
thank you so much for the help here.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115107
--- Comment #14 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Natalie Perlin from comment #9)
> All rebuilt, gnu/14.1.0 with openmpi/4.1.6, revised configuration of the
> software stack (spack-stack). Still the same error with
> [-Wimplicit-fu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115107
--- Comment #13 from Jakub Jelinek ---
So provide fixes upstream and hope they apply them soon.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115107
--- Comment #12 from Natalie Perlin ---
Jakub Jelinek - thanks for your note. At this point we may not do anything
during the build, as these packages are retrieved from official spack
repository. And yes, they may often carry a lot of legacy co
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115107
--- Comment #11 from Jakub Jelinek ---
You want to fix the code as described in e.g.
https://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-14/porting_to.html , not find workarounds. The code
was apparently never valid C99+.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115107
--- Comment #10 from Natalie Perlin ---
A workaround found for gnu/14.1.0 gcc that produces error instead of warnings
at times:
Using cflag="-Wno-implicit-function-declaration ..." helped to avoid errors in
the code location in my previous com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115107
--- Comment #9 from Natalie Perlin ---
All rebuilt, gnu/14.1.0 with openmpi/4.1.6, revised configuration of the
software stack (spack-stack). Still the same error with
[-Wimplicit-function-declaration].
Verified a build of the same stack with
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115107
--- Comment #8 from Natalie Perlin ---
anl...@gcc.gnu.org -
Thank you, this is a great observation! I will need to change the way the
spack-stack is built with gnu/14.1.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115107
--- Comment #7 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Natalie Perlin from comment #6)
> (In reply to anlauf from comment #3)
> > The traceback is essentially identical to that in pr114467.
> >
> > Can you please try the 14-release like
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115107
--- Comment #6 from Natalie Perlin ---
(In reply to anlauf from comment #3)
> The traceback is essentially identical to that in pr114467.
>
> Can you please try the 14-release like the other reporter, or the upcoming
> 13.3 release next week?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115107
--- Comment #5 from Natalie Perlin ---
Created attachment 58217
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=58217&action=edit
Most of the source files of the modules used for the fv_dynamics.F90
Most of the source files for the modules
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115107
--- Comment #4 from Natalie Perlin ---
Created attachment 58216
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=58216&action=edit
Log file from the build of the software
Log file from the build of the software (ufs-weather-model)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115107
--- Comment #3 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org ---
The traceback is essentially identical to that in pr114467.
Can you please try the 14-release like the other reporter, or the upcoming
13.3 release next week?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115107
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2024-05-15
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115107
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115107
--- Comment #1 from Jakub Jelinek ---
*** Bug 115108 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
19 matches
Mail list logo
