[Bug fortran/121628] Use-after-free in compiler-generated assignment operators

2025-09-10 Thread anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121628 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org --

[Bug fortran/121628] Use-after-free in compiler-generated assignment operators

2025-09-09 Thread anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121628 --- Comment #4 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to anlauf from comment #3) > For debugging, one can reduce the loop body further: > > a = b > b = a > > is sufficient for a crash in the second iteration. "Unrolling

[Bug fortran/121628] Use-after-free in compiler-generated assignment operators

2025-09-09 Thread anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121628 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||wrong-code --- Comment #3 fr

[Bug fortran/121628] Use-after-free in compiler-generated assignment operators

2025-08-21 Thread jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121628 Jerry DeLisle changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org Ever c

[Bug fortran/121628] Use-after-free in compiler-generated assignment operators

2025-08-21 Thread albert at tugraz dot at via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121628 --- Comment #1 from Christopher Albert --- Possibly related: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114612