[Bug fortran/18026] boz initialization of REALs fails

2014-02-16 Thread jackie.rosen at hushmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18026 Jackie Rosen jackie.rosen at hushmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[Bug fortran/18026] boz initialization of REALs fails

2007-12-08 Thread burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #16 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-12-08 21:47 --- Subject: Bug 18026 Author: burnus Date: Sat Dec 8 21:46:56 2007 New Revision: 130713 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=130713 Log: 2007-12-08 Tobias Burnus [EMAIL PROTECTED] PR

[Bug fortran/18026] boz initialization of REALs fails

2007-12-08 Thread burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #17 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-12-08 22:09 --- Fixed on the trunk (4.3.0). gfortran now transfers the BOZ in DATA inf / Z'7FF0' / DATA nan / Z'FFF8' / bitwise to the real/complex variables (contrary to g77 without needing an

[Bug fortran/18026] boz initialization of REALs fails

2007-08-06 Thread kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #14 from kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-08-06 17:30 --- *** Bug 33001 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug fortran/18026] boz initialization of REALs fails

2007-08-06 Thread kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #15 from kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-08-06 17:32 --- *** Bug 33002 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18026

[Bug fortran/18026] boz initialization of REALs fails

2006-10-23 Thread kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #11 from kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-10-23 17:10 --- *** Bug 29561 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug fortran/18026] boz initialization of REALs fails

2006-10-23 Thread tobias dot burnus at physik dot fu-berlin dot de
--- Comment #12 from tobias dot burnus at physik dot fu-berlin dot de 2006-10-23 18:52 --- Cf. also bug 29471. In the Intel Fortran Compiler real :: r data r/some BOZ/ gives the same result as using the Fortran 2003 statement in ifort: real :: r r = real(some boz) (At least with

[Bug fortran/18026] boz initialization of REALs fails

2006-10-23 Thread sgk at troutmask dot apl dot washington dot edu
--- Comment #13 from sgk at troutmask dot apl dot washington dot edu 2006-10-23 19:39 --- Subject: Re: boz initialization of REALs fails On Mon, Oct 23, 2006 at 06:52:06PM -, tobias dot burnus at physik dot fu-berlin dot de wrote: In the Intel Fortran Compiler real :: r

[Bug fortran/18026] boz initialization of REALs fails

2006-10-02 Thread fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #7 from fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-10-02 11:09 --- If it's a regression wrt g77, then it's not an enhancement, it's a bug. -- fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug fortran/18026] boz initialization of REALs fails

2006-10-02 Thread kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #8 from kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-10-02 16:47 --- Remove reject-valid keyword, again! Return this to enhancement. This is NOT a bug. g77 compatibility and the Fortran 95 standard have a conflict, and so IMNSHO the Fortran 95 standard wins. See comment #3. The

[Bug fortran/18026] boz initialization of REALs fails

2006-10-02 Thread anlauf at gmx dot de
--- Comment #9 from anlauf at gmx dot de 2006-10-02 21:35 --- (In reply to comment #8) This is NOT a bug. g77 compatibility and the Fortran 95 standard have a conflict, and so IMNSHO the Fortran 95 standard wins. Gfortran unfortunately does not have a switch to compile legacy code

[Bug fortran/18026] boz initialization of REALs fails

2006-10-02 Thread sgk at troutmask dot apl dot washington dot edu
--- Comment #10 from sgk at troutmask dot apl dot washington dot edu 2006-10-03 01:48 --- Subject: Re: boz initialization of REALs fails On Mon, Oct 02, 2006 at 09:35:11PM -, anlauf at gmx dot de wrote: This is NOT a bug. g77 compatibility and the Fortran 95 standard have

[Bug fortran/18026] boz initialization of REALs fails

2006-05-12 Thread guilloteau at obs dot u-bordeaux1 dot fr
--- Comment #5 from guilloteau at obs dot u-bordeaux1 dot fr 2006-05-12 13:05 --- Created an attachment (id=11443) -- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=11443action=view) A simple program showing that initialization of BOZ constants fails in modules. The test program

[Bug fortran/18026] boz initialization of REALs fails

2006-05-12 Thread kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #6 from kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-05-12 17:43 --- (In reply to comment #5) Created an attachment (id=11443) -- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=11443action=view) [edit] A simple program showing that initialization of BOZ constants fails in modules.

[Bug fortran/18026] boz initialization of REALs fails

2005-07-26 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-26 13:03 --- *** Bug 23074 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- What|Removed |Added

[Bug fortran/18026] boz initialization of REALs fails

2005-03-15 Thread kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-03-15 21:05 --- I've removed the reject-valid keyward because the code is not valid Fortran 95. From section 5.2.10, we have: If a data-statement-constant is a boz-literal-constant, the corresponding object shall be

[Bug fortran/18026] boz initialization of REALs fails

2005-03-13 Thread tobi at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From tobi at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-03-13 19:05 --- While the compile-time error has disappeared, we now give the following incorrect output at runtime: [EMAIL PROTECTED] tests]$ ./a.out 9.218868437227405E+018 1.89227389587E+019 [EMAIL PROTECTED] tests]$