--- Comment #13 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-02 21:01
---
Subject: Bug 18157
Author: pinskia
Date: Wed Nov 2 21:01:54 2005
New Revision: 106396
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=106396
Log:
2005-11-02 Andrew Pinski [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PR
--- Comment #14 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-02 21:12
---
Subject: Bug 18157
Author: pinskia
Date: Wed Nov 2 21:12:27 2005
New Revision: 106397
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=106397
Log:
2005-11-02 Andrew Pinski [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PR
--- Comment #15 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-02 21:12
---
Fixed in 4.0.3 and above, thanks for your report.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #12 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-10-25 14:59
---
Patch posted: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2005-10/msg01489.html
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #7 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-10-24 14:06 ---
Hmm, looks like the front-end is not using the correct expression, I might look
at this one soon.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #8 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-10-24 15:22 ---
The left hand side is not getting the correct tree, we only have array[tmp]
instead of array[tmp].field.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18157
--- Comment #9 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-10-24 17:03 ---
At trans-expr.c:2756:
2756 tmp = gfc_trans_scalar_assign (lse, rse, expr1-ts.type);
lse is wrong. looking more into it.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18157
--- Comment #10 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-10-24 18:16
---
Here is the full problem, we get a loop.temp_ss but we don't build a reference
off from that to var.
Though, really we should get a REAL type loop.temp_ss instead of a user defined
type. Looking how to get the
--- Comment #11 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-10-24 18:43
---
I have a patch now which I am testing now.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-09-16
16:43 ---
*** Bug 23922 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
What|Removed |Added
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-09-16
16:47 ---
Backtrace:
#1 0x08179a9f in fancy_abort (file=Could not find the frame base for
fancy_abort.
) at /home/peshtigo/pinskia/src/gnu/gcc/src/gcc/diagnostic.c:590
#2 0x081ff931 in fold_convert
--- Additional Comments From c dot lemmen at fz-juelich dot de 2005-06-08
12:19 ---
Bug persists in GNU F95 version 4.1.0 20050608, line number is now
testing/testcase_fold.f90: In Funktion »MAIN__«:
testing/testcase_fold.f90:22: interner Compiler-Fehler: in fold_convert, bei
--- Additional Comments From c dot lemmen at fz-juelich dot de 2004-10-26 11:29
---
Created an attachment (id=7412)
-- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=7412action=view)
This is the reduced testcase
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18157
--- Additional Comments From reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-10-26 12:12
---
Confirmed.
--
What|Removed |Added
CC||reichelt
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-10-26 13:08
---
Hmm, we are trying to convert a float to a struct type which is invalid, why the
front-end is doing this
beyond me.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18157
15 matches
Mail list logo
