--- Comment #11 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-12-14 12:26 ---
I think this effectively a duplicate of PR 34004.
The example of comment 0 is invalid (the specific functions have arguments
which are not distinguishable per the Fortran standard, see PR 34004). That can
--- Comment #10 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-08-20 03:48 ---
(In reply to comment #9)
(In reply to comment #8)
Paul, what is the status on this one?
ping?
Go back to the thread on it. I did not seem able to satisfy the reviewer as to
my interpretation of the standard;
--- Comment #9 from fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-08-16 11:50
---
(In reply to comment #8)
Paul, what is the status on this one?
ping?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20896
--- Comment #8 from fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-05-10 23:20
---
Paul, what is the status on this one?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20896
--- Comment #7 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-01-31 09:55 ---
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2007-01/msg00145.html
Do we have consensus yet on this?
The standard is not exactly straight forward interpret.
I'm not 100% sure. The standard is indeed not very clear about
--- Comment #6 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-01-21 20:41
---
What is the status on this now? After reviewing the standard I think I am in
agreement with what this patch does. The standard is not exactly straight
forward interpret.
Do we have consensus yet on this? If
--- Comment #5 from patchapp at dberlin dot org 2007-01-03 18:05 ---
Subject: Bug number PR20896
A patch for this bug has been added to the patch tracker.
The mailing list url for the patch is
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2007-01/msg00145.html
--
--- Comment #4 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-01-02 14:23 ---
Subject: Bug 20896
Author: pault
Date: Tue Jan 2 14:23:36 2007
New Revision: 120342
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=120342
Log:
2007-01-02 Paul Thomas [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PR
--- Comment #3 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-12-27 16:38 ---
I suppose that I had better accept it...
Paul
--
pault at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
