--- Additional Comments From denis dot nagorny at intel dot com 2005-06-22
14:34 ---
Ok. It seems like this issue is mostly fixed now. I incresead NIT counter up
to 200 and obtained following results:
3.4.2 ~ 3.4s
old 4.0 ~ 6.4s
mainline ~ 4.0s
--
--- Additional Comments From fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-06-19
07:34 ---
On Pentium III (Coppermine), 864 MHz, 256 KB cache, with linux. Timing in
seconds:
g77: 9.52s
gfortran: 9.49s
g77 -O2: 3.11s
gfortran -O2: 3.39s
g77 -O3 -ffast-math: 3.09s
gfortran -O3 -ffast-math:
--
What|Removed |Added
CC||hjl at lucon dot org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20945
--- Additional Comments From denis dot nagorny at intel dot com 2005-04-11
13:20 ---
Created an attachment (id=8591)
-- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=8591action=view)
Test for results reproducing
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20945
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-04-11
13:28 ---
I know that gfortran has some issue with inlining.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20945
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-04-11
20:08 ---
Note I think this is just the register allocator being stupid.
See PR 18048 for another bug report about this.
Though I note on ppc-darwin, I cannot reproduce the problem you see with your
testcase.
--
