https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21130
Bug 21130 depends on bug 25708, which changed state.
Bug 25708 Summary: [F95] Module loading is not good at all
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25708
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #16 from paul dot thomas at jet dot uk 2006-09-20 09:22 ---
(In reply to comment #15)
looks like there is agreement that the problem is fixed.
I am afraid to say that I do not agree entirely; the above takes 6 seconds to
compile with ifort on my Athlon 1700 a vapeur. The
--- Comment #15 from bdavis at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-05-12 16:05 ---
looks like there is agreement that the problem is fixed.
--
bdavis at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #14 from steven at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-05-05 18:42 ---
Bud already voted to close this in comment #11 :-)
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21130
--- Comment #13 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-05-05 05:40
---
Bud, unless you are going to chase this further I vote that you close this PR.
Was the patch going to go to 4.1 branch as well?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21130
--
bdavis at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |bdavis at gcc dot gnu dot
|dot org
--- Comment #9 from bdavis at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-03-30 13:52 ---
after the above patch, here is a profile of the last file (that takes so long
to compile):
Each sample counts as 0.01 seconds.
% cumulative self self total
time seconds secondscalls
--- Comment #10 from bdavis at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-03-30 13:58 ---
with the same patch, the aermod.f90 :
Each sample counts as 0.01 seconds.
% cumulative self self total
time seconds secondscalls s/call s/call name
7.69 8.80 8.80
--- Comment #11 from bdavis at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-03-30 14:04 ---
if this patch gets accepted, i vote to close the PR. we are still slower than
we should be, but it is now linear and compiles in a 'reasonable time'.
--bud
--
--- Comment #12 from bdavis at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-03-31 00:47 ---
Subject: Bug 21130
Author: bdavis
Date: Fri Mar 31 00:47:13 2006
New Revision: 112558
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=112558
Log:
2006-03-30 Paul Thomas [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bud Davis
--- Comment #7 from bdavis at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-03-29 01:47 ---
proposed patch:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2006-03/msg00517.html
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2006-03/msg00518.html
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21130
--- Comment #8 from howarth at nitro dot med dot uc dot edu 2006-03-29
04:32 ---
I can confirm this patch resolves the test case on MacOS X with gcc 4.1
branch...
Before patch...
Tue Mar 28 23:06:11 EST 2006
The following file will take roughly 10 minutes to compile
Tue Mar 28
--- Comment #6 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-03-02 16:10 ---
aermod of Polyhedron has the same problem.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21130
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-09-19
00:49 ---
Confirmed.
--
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
--- Additional Comments From jvdelisle at verizon dot net 2005-04-24 04:05
---
ifort does it in about 5 seconds. It issues several warnings about alignments,
but otherwise completes quickly.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21130
--- Additional Comments From epperly2 at llnl dot gov 2005-04-20 22:46
---
Created an attachment (id=8690)
-- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=8690action=view)
Source files and compile script to reproduce the performance issue
I am attaching a bzip2 compressed tar file
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-04-21
00:01 ---
Hmm, this comes from loading modules or something related to that.
--
What|Removed |Added
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-04-21
00:14 ---
The compile time problem is located in load_needed in module.c but I don't know
how to fix it easily.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21130
18 matches
Mail list logo
