[Bug fortran/23994] PROTECTED attribute (F2003) is not implemented

2006-11-07 Thread pault at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #4 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-11-07 21:41 --- Have removed the rejects-valid keyword. Paul -- pault at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug fortran/23994] PROTECTED attribute (F2003) is not implemented

2006-05-08 Thread fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #3 from fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-05-08 08:37 --- A good documentation for PROTECTED, in addition to the standard itself, is http://publib.boulder.ibm.com/infocenter/pseries/v5r3/index.jsp?topic=/com.ibm.xlf101a.doc/xlflr/protected.htm -- fxcoudert at gcc

[Bug fortran/23994] PROTECTED attribute (F2003) is not implemented

2005-09-21 Thread tobi at gcc dot gnu dot org
-- What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Ever Confirmed||1 Last reconfirmed|-00-00 00:00:00

[Bug fortran/23994] PROTECTED attribute (F2003) is not implemented

2005-09-21 Thread fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-09-21 11:26 --- [in answer to pinskia, who added the keyword accepts-invalid] Currently, gfortran doesn't accept this code: $ gfortran -std=f2003 a.f90 In file a.f90:2 REAL,PROTECTED :: temp 1 Error: Syntax

[Bug fortran/23994] PROTECTED attribute (F2003) is not implemented

2005-09-21 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-09-21 11:32 --- I got this wrong because I thought from comment one it was accepting the attribute already but just ignoring it. -- What|Removed |Added