[Bug fortran/24705] ICE on assumed length character result

2005-12-12 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
-- pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.0.3 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24705

[Bug fortran/24705] ICE on assumed length character result

2005-11-30 Thread pault at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #6 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-30 19:26 --- Subject: Bug 24705 Author: pault Date: Wed Nov 30 19:26:23 2005 New Revision: 107732 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=107732 Log: 2005-11-30 Paul Thomas [EMAIL PROTECTED] PR

[Bug fortran/24705] ICE on assumed length character result

2005-11-30 Thread pault at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #7 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-30 19:36 --- fixed in all 4.x -- pault at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug fortran/24705] ICE on assumed length character result

2005-11-28 Thread eedelman at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #5 from eedelman at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-28 22:36 --- *** Bug 25081 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- eedelman at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug fortran/24705] ICE on assumed length character result

2005-11-21 Thread pault at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #3 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-21 16:06 --- Subject: Bug 24705 Author: pault Date: Mon Nov 21 16:05:58 2005 New Revision: 107310 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=107310 Log: 2005-11-21 Paul Thomas [EMAIL PROTECTED] PR

[Bug fortran/24705] ICE on assumed length character result

2005-11-21 Thread pault at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #4 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-21 20:03 --- Subject: Bug 24705 Author: pault Date: Mon Nov 21 20:02:54 2005 New Revision: 107320 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=107320 Log: 2005-11-21 Paul Thomas [EMAIL PROTECTED] PR

[Bug fortran/24705] ICE on assumed length character result

2005-11-10 Thread paul dot richard dot thomas at cea dot fr
--- Comment #2 from paul dot richard dot thomas at cea dot fr 2005-11-10 15:54 --- The following patch fixes this PR. Please note that it has yet to be regtested but I do not see any problems with it. I do not thank that PR15809 has anything to do with this one. Index: