http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25062
Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||zeccav at
--- Comment #10 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-07-03 21:41 ---
Subject: Bug 25062
Author: burnus
Date: Tue Jul 3 21:41:34 2007
New Revision: 126279
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=126279
Log:
2007-07-03 Tobias Burnus [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PR
--- Comment #11 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-07-03 21:45 ---
Fixed. Note that the F95 standard is stricter than F2003. I added one -std=95
only check and two general checks. Still gfortran is too strict for F2003; see
PR32515.
--
burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
--
burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |burnus at gcc dot gnu dot
|dot org
--- Comment #9 from patchapp at dberlin dot org 2007-06-26 16:25 ---
Subject: Bug number PR 25062
A patch for this bug has been added to the patch tracker.
The mailing list url for the patch is
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2007-06/msg01932.html
--
--- Comment #8 from tobi at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-01-12 10:13 ---
Thanks, Steve.
--
tobi at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #2 from tobi at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-01-11 14:29 ---
I'm quite sure it's not, but it would be a first, if Joost were wrong. Is
there anything special about parameters? Something like
real x
common /x/ y
or even
common /x/ x
is perfectly valid.
--
tobi at
--- Comment #3 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-01-11 14:32 ---
Even Lahey's Fortran 90 and their 95 compiler does not error out about this.
I wonder if xlf does.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25062
--- Comment #4 from jv244 at cam dot ac dot uk 2006-01-11 15:57 ---
(In reply to comment #3)
Even Lahey's Fortran 90 and their 95 compiler does not error out about this.
I wonder if xlf does.
xlf90 -qsuffix=f=f90 mytest.f90
mytest.f90, line 2.9: 1514-259 (S) A name must not be
--- Comment #6 from tobi at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-01-12 00:18 ---
I'm setting this to waiting until someone quotes something from the standard.
Fortran has its quirks, but disallowing this special case would break the
distintion between the names of commons and those of other named
--- Comment #7 from kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-01-12 05:25 ---
See 14.1.2.1.
A common block name in a scoping unit also may be the name of any local
entity other than a named constant, intrinsic procedure, or a local variable
that is also an external function in a
--- Comment #1 from fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-26 19:41
---
Well, only g95 sees this bug. Is it really a violation of the standard? I don't
think so...
## g95 ##
In file foo.f90:1
INTEGER, PARAMETER :: C1=1
1
Error: COMMON block 'c1' at (1) is
12 matches
Mail list logo
