[Bug fortran/25099] Conformance of arguments to ELEMENTAL subroutines

2006-05-08 Thread pault at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #7 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-05-08 06:27 --- Fixed on trunk and 4.1 Paul -- pault at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug fortran/25099] Conformance of arguments to ELEMENTAL subroutines

2006-05-07 Thread pault at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #6 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-05-08 05:02 --- Subject: Bug 25099 Author: pault Date: Mon May 8 05:01:56 2006 New Revision: 113618 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=113618 Log: 2006-05-08 Paul Thomas [EMAIL PROTECTED] PR

[Bug fortran/25099] Conformance of arguments to ELEMENTAL subroutines

2006-04-23 Thread pault at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #5 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-04-23 11:56 --- Subject: Bug 25099 Author: pault Date: Sun Apr 23 11:56:37 2006 New Revision: 113194 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=113194 Log: 2006-04-23 Paul Thomas [EMAIL PROTECTED] PR

[Bug fortran/25099] Conformance of arguments to ELEMENTAL subroutines

2006-04-21 Thread patchapp at dberlin dot org
--- Comment #4 from patchapp at dberlin dot org 2006-04-21 16:15 --- Subject: Bug number PR25099 A patch for this bug has been added to the patch tracker. The mailing list url for the patch is http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2006-04/msg00802.html --

[Bug fortran/25099] Conformance of arguments to ELEMENTAL subroutines

2006-02-28 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #3 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-03-01 02:14 --- This ICEs for me on the mainline, backtrace: #0 integer_onep (expr=0x0) at /Users/pinskia/src/gcc/local/gcc/gcc/tree.c:1226 #1 0x0006bf90 in gfc_conv_loop_setup (loop=0xb7d8) at

[Bug fortran/25099] Conformance of arguments to ELEMENTAL subroutines

2005-11-30 Thread eedelman at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #1 from eedelman at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-30 11:33 --- Currently gfortran crashes on this code, because of PR 22146. I'll leave this PR (rather than marking it as a duplicate) as a reminder that, when we fix PR 22146, we need to check conformance of arguments as well.

[Bug fortran/25099] Conformance of arguments to ELEMENTAL subroutines

2005-11-30 Thread eedelman at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #2 from eedelman at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-30 13:23 --- *** Bug 25100 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25099