[Bug fortran/25104] Non-initialization expr. as case-selector

2006-05-12 Thread fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #5 from fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-05-12 21:18 --- Well, the testcase is valid F2003 but not valid F95. We have to get it working (for F2003 mode), which probably means adding a simplification function for MAXLOC. And the same is true for all the intrinsics

[Bug fortran/25104] Non-initialization expr. as case-selector

2006-01-09 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #4 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-01-10 04:39 --- Yes, we are not rejecting this early enough so we get the ICE in the trans* functions. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25104

[Bug fortran/25104] Non-initialization expr. as case-selector

2005-11-30 Thread eedelman at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #3 from eedelman at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-30 18:29 --- (In reply to comment #2) context, so I'm not sure what to think here ... I leave this as unconfirmed for now. Ifort 8.1 reports the following error: In a CASE statement, the case-value must be a constant