https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25297
Fritz Reese changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||foreese at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #4 from jb at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-07-28 20:13 ---
Closing as WONTFIX, since nobody seems interested in a) implementing this
feature b) maintaining it.
As already mentioned, gfortran supports Fortran derived types which can be used
for similar purposes as these proposed
--- Comment #3 from steven at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-07-03 21:52 ---
Paul,
Since gfortran is developed by volunteers who are often gfortran users
themselves, it usually depends on the needs of the developers what gets
implemented in gfortran. Given that nobody has responded to your
--
tobi at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever Confirmed|0 |1
Last
--- Comment #1 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-07 17:19 ---
Why can't you use the standard Fortran 90/95 derived types?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25297
--- Comment #2 from martinol at nrlssc dot navy dot mil 2005-12-07 17:37
---
I require a library that is not under my control to change (I have the source,
but am not the primary developer) and it was written using the SGI f77
compiler. I would like to see this construct added to
