--- Comment #6 from fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-11-17 11:16
---
Fixed on mainline (rev. 118930)
--
fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #5 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-11-07 21:38 ---
FX,
I think that the keywords patch and rejects valid are both incorrect for this
PR - it's an enhancement, plain and simple.
Paul
--
pault at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed
--- Comment #4 from fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-10-30 12:16
---
*** Bug 29643 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #3 from fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-10-21 17:30
---
It's an enhancement (and actually, it's being worked on).
--
fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #1 from jb at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-01-07 17:58 ---
Confirmed.
Incidentally, you can find the final draft of F2003 (which differs very little
from the published standard) at
http://www.j3-fortran.org/doc/year/04/04-007.pdf
--
jb at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
--- Comment #2 from jb at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-01-07 18:09 ---
Actually, you got the syntax slightly wrong (sorry for not noticing it right
away).
The standard (and from my reading of the ibm docs it seems that they agree with
the standard) specifices the use statement as
use [[,
