--- Comment #24 from paul dot richard dot thomas at cea dot fr 2006-08-10
12:11 ---
(In reply to comment #23)
Tonto failed to build again.
HJ
Can we close this again? Steve's patch fixed the problem, as far as I know.
Regards
Paul Thomas
--
--- Comment #25 from hjl at lucon dot org 2006-08-10 16:40 ---
It is fixed in 4.2 now.
--
hjl at lucon dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED
--- Comment #23 from hjl at lucon dot org 2006-07-30 23:27 ---
Tonto failed to build again.
--
hjl at lucon dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
BugsThisDependsOn|
--- Comment #22 from hjl at lucon dot org 2006-05-30 16:08 ---
Tonto in SPEC CPU 2006 should work now with gcc 4.1 and 4.2.
--
hjl at lucon dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #21 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-04-22 04:48
---
I am able to compile with -g OK. Not sure what I was seeing the other night.
Here is a backtrace where I see a segfault:
(gdb) bt
#0 0x082c1c15 in __atom_module__n_bf ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) at
--- Comment #19 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-04-20 06:21
---
Created an attachment (id=11300)
-- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=11300action=view)
tonto-1.0 input file stdin.h.uhf
With this attachment as input I get a successful output with tonto-1.0.
--- Comment #20 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-04-20 06:25
---
Created an attachment (id=11301)
-- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=11301action=view)
tonto-1.0 output for stdin.h.uhf
Here is the output from the above patch. When I go to stdin.h2o.blyp I get
--- Comment #18 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-04-19 04:59 ---
(In reply to comment #15)
I can now compile tonto-1.0 without any kludges or tricks. That said, it
segfaults immediately after reading the input data. I will endeavour to find
the cause.
This happens in a call
--- Comment #15 from paul dot richard dot thomas at cea dot fr 2006-04-13
13:36 ---
I can now compile tonto-1.0 without any kludges or tricks. That said, it
segfaults immediately after reading the input data. I will endeavour to find
the cause.
tonto-2.x is blocked by complex(ie.
--- Comment #16 from hjl at lucon dot org 2006-04-13 13:48 ---
Created an attachment (id=11257)
-- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=11257action=view)
A patch to nullify pointers in local variables
Tonto 1.0 has many local variables with uninitialized pointers. This patch
--- Comment #17 from hjl at lucon dot org 2006-04-13 13:49 ---
Created an attachment (id=11258)
-- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=11258action=view)
Another patch
This is another patch to initialize local variable and fix a typo.
--
--- Comment #14 from paul dot richard dot thomas at cea dot fr 2006-04-10
15:07 ---
(In reply to comment #13)
PR23634 does not affect this PR. So only two bugs left. I checked by
commenting out the lines effecting compiling.
I have submitted 2 PRs for tonto-2.2; PR25597 and
--- Comment #4 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-03-15 16:53 ---
You will be glad to hear that, at long last, I am putting the finishing touches
to a patch for transfer. It needs comments and a fine-toothed combing of the
code. I maybe will submit it tomorrow morning.
Paul
--- Comment #5 from kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-03-15 17:26 ---
(In reply to comment #4)
You will be glad to hear that, at long last, I am putting the finishing
touches
to a patch for transfer. It needs comments and a fine-toothed combing of the
code. I maybe will submit it
--- Comment #6 from hjl at lucon dot org 2006-03-15 19:31 ---
Please point out the non-standard code in tonto in detail. I will report it to
our SPEC people.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26106
--- Comment #7 from kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-03-15 20:01 ---
(In reply to comment #6)
Please point out the non-standard code in tonto in detail. I will report it to
our SPEC people.
I believe that the code associated with gfortran's error message
is nonstandard at least
--- Comment #8 from hjl at lucon dot org 2006-03-15 20:18 ---
Is that the exact output? I couldn't find similar thing in my log. The
closest things I have are
/usr/gcc-4.2/bin/gfortran -I. -I./GCC-gfortran-on-LINUX/modules -O -c -o
./GCC-gfortran-on-LINUX/objects/intvec.o
--- Comment #9 from kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-03-15 20:42 ---
(In reply to comment #8)
Is that the exact output?
Yes, of course!
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26106
--- Comment #10 from hjl at lucon dot org 2006-03-15 23:28 ---
(In reply to comment #9)
(In reply to comment #8)
Is that the exact output?
Yes, of course!
I assum you tried to compile f95files/intvec.F90. I have no problem with it:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] tonto]$ perl Makefile.pl
On Mar 15, 2006, at 6:28 PM, hjl at lucon dot org wrote:
--- Comment #10 from hjl at lucon dot org 2006-03-15 23:28 ---
(In reply to comment #9)
(In reply to comment #8)
Is that the exact output?
Yes, of course!
I assum you tried to compile f95files/intvec.F90. I have no
--- Comment #11 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-03-15 23:33
---
Subject: Re: [meta-bug] Gfortran can't compile tonto
On Mar 15, 2006, at 6:28 PM, hjl at lucon dot org wrote:
--- Comment #10 from hjl at lucon dot org 2006-03-15 23:28 ---
(In reply to comment
--- Comment #12 from hjl at lucon dot org 2006-03-16 00:14 ---
I(In reply to comment #11)
Subject: Re: [meta-bug] Gfortran can't compile tonto
On Mar 15, 2006, at 6:28 PM, hjl at lucon dot org wrote:
--- Comment #10 from hjl at lucon dot org 2006-03-15 23:28 ---
--- Comment #13 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-03-16 05:08
---
PR23634 does not affect this PR. So only two bugs left. I checked by
commenting out the lines effecting compiling.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed
--- Comment #2 from kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-03-11 19:27 ---
I can't reproduce any of these failures (except for __transfer1).
HJ, can you at least attached the preprocessed code?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26106
--- Comment #3 from hjl at lucon dot org 2006-03-11 20:15 ---
I don't know how to preprocess Fortran code. I still see those failures with
gcc version 4.2.0 20060311 (experimental) [trunk revision 111963 clean]
on Linux/x86-64. For example:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] tonto]$
--- Comment #1 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-02-05 16:41 ---
PR 17298 is for __transfer1 TODO
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
BugsThisDependsOn||26038, 26041
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
27 matches
Mail list logo
