[Bug fortran/27089] Module procedure with explicit result does not pass type to specification expression.

2006-04-22 Thread pault at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #4 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-04-23 05:33 --- Subject: Bug 27089 Author: pault Date: Sun Apr 23 05:33:16 2006 New Revision: 113191 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=113191 Log: 2006-04-23 Paul Thomas [EMAIL PROTECTED] PR

[Bug fortran/27089] Module procedure with explicit result does not pass type to specification expression.

2006-04-22 Thread pault at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #5 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-04-23 05:41 --- Fixed on trunk but not fixable on 4.1 because of divergences between the trees. Paul -- pault at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug fortran/27089] Module procedure with explicit result does not pass type to specification expression.

2006-04-15 Thread pault at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #3 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-04-16 03:45 --- Subject: Bug 27089 Author: pault Date: Sun Apr 16 03:45:24 2006 New Revision: 112981 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=112981 Log: 2006-04-16 Paul Thomas [EMAIL PROTECTED] PR

[Bug fortran/27089] Module procedure with explicit result does not pass type to specification expression.

2006-04-10 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
-- pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Ever Confirmed|0 |1 Last

[Bug fortran/27089] Module procedure with explicit result does not pass type to specification expression.

2006-04-09 Thread patchapp at dberlin dot org
--- Comment #2 from patchapp at dberlin dot org 2006-04-09 16:55 --- Subject: Bug number PR27089 A patch for this bug has been added to the patch tracker. The mailing list url for the patch is http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2006-04/msg00322.html --

[Bug fortran/27089] Module procedure with explicit result does not pass type to specification expression.

2006-04-08 Thread pault at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #1 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-04-09 04:55 --- Duuuh! I forgot a little something... In file test.f90:19 integer(4), dimension(n_elements_uncommon_with_(x)) :: res 1 Error: Expression at (1) must be of INTEGER type In file