--- Comment #12 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-04-21 03:53
---
Fixed on 4.1 and 4.2.
--
jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #11 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-04-21 03:51
---
Subject: Bug 27138
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Fri Apr 21 03:51:44 2006
New Revision: 113132
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=113132
Log:
2006-04-20 Jerry DeLisle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--- Comment #10 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-04-21 03:47
---
Subject: Bug 27138
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Fri Apr 21 03:47:23 2006
New Revision: 113131
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=113131
Log:
2006-04-20 Jerry DeLisle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--- Comment #9 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-04-17 02:37
---
Subject: Bug 27138
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Mon Apr 17 02:37:15 2006
New Revision: 113000
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=113000
Log:
2006-04-16 Jerry DeLisle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--- Comment #8 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-04-17 02:33
---
Subject: Bug 27138
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Mon Apr 17 02:33:51 2006
New Revision: 112999
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=112999
Log:
2006-04-14 Jerry DeLisle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--- Comment #7 from patchapp at dberlin dot org 2006-04-15 03:00 ---
Subject: Bug number PR27138
A patch for this bug has been added to the patch tracker.
The mailing list url for the patch is
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2006-04/msg00547.html
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/sh
--- Comment #6 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-04-14 05:50
---
Created an attachment (id=11263)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=11263&action=view)
Proposed Patch
This is a proposed patch you can try out while I work up a more complete test
case. The exam
--- Comment #5 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-04-13 07:20
---
The "engima" referred to in comment#2 is because it is a list directed read and
commas and spaces are deliminators. If you turn this into a read with a format
of '(a)' you get the whole string.
I am still workin
--- Comment #4 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-04-13 04:26
---
I have looked this over. Its a matter of what behavior is acceptable for each
type of error we get. My interpretation of your testcase is that we should do
a next_record when we detect the error before we do the
--- Comment #3 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-04-13 00:22
---
I will investigate.
--
jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
As
--- Comment #2 from tobias dot burnus at physik dot fu-berlin dot de
2006-04-12 21:05 ---
If one replaces the third read by
character(len=300) :: str
READ (5,*,END=100,ERR=99) str
WRITE(*,*) trim(str)
one sees that the first two failing READs advance by one character each
('i','g'
11 matches
Mail list logo
