[Bug fortran/28176] FAIL: gfortran.dg/actual_array_constructor_1.f90 -O0 (ICE)

2006-10-19 Thread sje at cup dot hp dot com
--- Comment #8 from sje at cup dot hp dot com 2006-10-19 18:09 --- Well, I found that the TImode is getting introduced in layout_type. For an ARRAY_TYPE tree there is this line: TYPE_SIZE (type) = size_binop (MULT_EXPR, element_size,

[Bug fortran/28176] FAIL: gfortran.dg/actual_array_constructor_1.f90 -O0 (ICE)

2006-10-18 Thread sje at cup dot hp dot com
--- Comment #4 from sje at cup dot hp dot com 2006-10-18 18:16 --- Looking at my old logs it looks like gfortran.dg/actual_array_constructor_1.f90 has been failing on hppa64 since it first went in on April 21, 2006. Someone is creating a TImode variable even though hppa64 doesn't

[Bug fortran/28176] FAIL: gfortran.dg/actual_array_constructor_1.f90 -O0 (ICE)

2006-10-18 Thread dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca
--- Comment #5 from dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca 2006-10-18 18:51 --- Subject: Re: FAIL: gfortran.dg/actual_array_constructor_1.f90 -O0 (ICE) Looking at my old logs it looks like gfortran.dg/actual_array_constructor_1.f90 has been failing on hppa64 since it first went

[Bug fortran/28176] FAIL: gfortran.dg/actual_array_constructor_1.f90 -O0 (ICE)

2006-10-18 Thread sje at cup dot hp dot com
--- Comment #6 from sje at cup dot hp dot com 2006-10-18 20:49 --- Well, I have tracked it back a little ways. gfc_trans_vla_type_sizes_1 calls gfc_trans_vla_one_sizepos with: gfc_trans_vla_one_sizepos (TYPE_SIZE (type), body); If I print out type-type.size I see: gdb) p

[Bug fortran/28176] FAIL: gfortran.dg/actual_array_constructor_1.f90 -O0 (ICE)

2006-10-18 Thread dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca
--- Comment #7 from dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca 2006-10-19 01:56 --- Subject: Re: FAIL: gfortran.dg/actual_array_constructor_1.f90 -O0 (ICE) So I have a TImode here. How it got here, I don't yet know. I checked that pa_scalar_mode_supported_p is called and rejects

[Bug fortran/28176] FAIL: gfortran.dg/actual_array_constructor_1.f90 -O0 (ICE)

2006-07-06 Thread danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #3 from danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-07-06 16:49 --- There seem to be more files now but they might be new tests. See http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2006-04/msg00445.html. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28176

[Bug fortran/28176] FAIL: gfortran.dg/actual_array_constructor_1.f90 -O0 (ICE)

2006-06-28 Thread pault at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #2 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-06-28 13:22 --- (In reply to comment #1) John, Have all these errors just appeared or do they go back to the era of actual_array_constructor_1.f90; ie 04/04/06? The reason that I ask is that I am wondering if this is an incipient

[Bug fortran/28176] FAIL: gfortran.dg/actual_array_constructor_1.f90 -O0 (ICE)

2006-06-26 Thread danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #1 from danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-06-27 01:53 --- FAIL: gfortran.dg/actual_array_substr_1.f90 -O0 (internal compiler error) FAIL: gfortran.dg/actual_array_substr_1.f90 -O0 (test for excess errors) WARNING: gfortran.dg/actual_array_substr_1.f90 -O0 compilation