--- Comment #13 from kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-06 01:38 ---
Subject: Bug 28548
Author: kargl
Date: Sun Aug 6 01:38:46 2006
New Revision: 115963
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=115963
Log:
2006-08-05 Steven G. Kargl [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PR
--- Comment #11 from paul dot richard dot thomas at cea dot fr 2006-08-04
08:14 ---
Steve and Martin,
Hmm, but my point was that even if gfortran thinks that the __convert_*
routines are elemental (as was mentioned in an earlier comment), it should
still compile the code without
--- Comment #12 from paul dot richard dot thomas at cea dot fr 2006-08-04
09:53 ---
Created an attachment (id=12016)
-- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=12016action=view)
A modified fix to take account of comments
I have taken Steve's patch and changed the error to a
--- Comment #7 from martin at mpa-garching dot mpg dot de 2006-08-03 06:22
---
(In reply to comment #3)
Andrew, I think it is a bug. The language in section 12.4.1.5 is somewhat
convoluted and the description of PRESENT() suggest that PRESENT is special.
From 12.4.1.5:
An
--- Comment #8 from sgk at troutmask dot apl dot washington dot edu
2006-08-03 06:26 ---
Subject: Re: [4.2 Regression]: Optional argument failed
On Thu, Aug 03, 2006 at 06:22:10AM -, martin at mpa-garching dot mpg dot de
wrote:
My understanding of this is that the error
--- Comment #9 from martin at mpa-garching dot mpg dot de 2006-08-03 06:40
---
(In reply to comment #8)
I just submitted a patch that appears to fix the problem.
The problem is __convert_* (ie internal gfortran functions)
are caught by the error checking.
Hmm, but my point was
--- Comment #10 from sgk at troutmask dot apl dot washington dot edu
2006-08-03 16:17 ---
Subject: Re: [4.2 Regression]: Optional argument failed
On Thu, Aug 03, 2006 at 06:40:21AM -, martin at mpa-garching dot mpg dot de
wrote:
Hmm, but my point was that even if gfortran thinks
the
problems and sort them out in one fell swoop.
Best regards
Paul
Message du 31/07/06 02:23
De : kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org
A : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Copie à :
Objet : [Bug fortran/28548] [4.2 Regression]: Optional argument failed
--- Comment #3 from kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-07
--
steven at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever Confirmed|0 |1
Last
--- Comment #5 from kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-03 04:49 ---
Some progress has been. Craig Powers suggested that the problem was
with PRESENT but perhaps a conversion function. If I change HJ's code
to use the same type and kind type parameter, then everything works
fine.
--- Comment #6 from sgk at troutmask dot apl dot washington dot edu
2006-08-03 05:09 ---
Subject: Re: [4.2 Regression]: Optional argument failed
On Thu, Aug 03, 2006 at 04:49:33AM -, kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote:
(gdb) print *isym
$28 = {name = 0x8869b61
--- Comment #1 from hjl at lucon dot org 2006-07-30 23:29 ---
It is caused by
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2006-07/msg00115.html
--
hjl at lucon dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #2 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-07-30 23:53 ---
From reading the error message, it looks correct as the types are different.
HJL can you first read the pointed to part of the standard and see if this is
true if so then gfortran is correct.
--
--- Comment #3 from kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-07-31 00:23 ---
Andrew, I think it is a bug. The language in section 12.4.1.5 is somewhat
convoluted and the description of PRESENT() suggest that PRESENT is special.
From 12.4.1.5:
An optional dummy argument that is not
14 matches
Mail list logo
