--- Comment #6 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-01-27 18:23 ---
Subject: Bug 30407
Author: pault
Date: Sat Jan 27 18:23:14 2007
New Revision: 121235
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=121235
Log:
2007-01-27 Paul Thomas [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PR
--- Comment #4 from patchapp at dberlin dot org 2007-01-21 22:00 ---
Subject: Bug number PR30407
A patch for this bug has been added to the patch tracker.
The mailing list url for the patch is
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2007-01/msg01744.html
--
--- Comment #5 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-01-22 05:17 ---
Dang it! In spite of New Year's resolutions, I had better take it.
Paul
--
pault at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #3 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-01-17 14:11 ---
Expected: As elemental procedures are also allowed, a case
EXEC_ASSIGN_CALL:
has to be added.
This is the easy bit... You then get:
$ /irun/bin/gfortran pr30407.f90
pr30407.f90: In function 'MAIN__':
--- Comment #2 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-01-09 20:36 ---
(In reply to comment #1)
A look into resolve.c's resolve_where, shows that only EXEC_ASSIGN and not
EXEC_ASSIGN_CALL exists in switch (cnext-op).
Expected: As elemental procedures are also allowed, a case
