--- Comment #6 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-04-07 21:34 ---
Fixed on trumk
Paul
--
pault at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status
--- Comment #5 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-04-07 21:29 ---
Subject: Bug 31257
Author: pault
Date: Sat Apr 7 21:29:13 2007
New Revision: 123646
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=123646
Log:
2007-04-07 Paul Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
PR fortran/
--- Comment #4 from patchapp at dberlin dot org 2007-04-07 15:45 ---
Subject: Bug number PR31257
A patch for this bug has been added to the patch tracker.
The mailing list url for the patch is
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2007-04/msg00321.html
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/sh
--- Comment #3 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-04-07 08:50 ---
(In reply to comment #2)
> This looks related to 31218, so I'm adding a dependency even though I'm not
> certain it's the same. Also confirming, because it's definitely a bug even if
> it's a duplicate one.
>
It migh
--- Comment #2 from brooks at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-04-06 23:12 ---
This looks related to 31218, so I'm adding a dependency even though I'm not
certain it's the same. Also confirming, because it's definitely a bug even if
it's a duplicate one.
--
brooks at gcc dot gnu dot org cha
--- Comment #1 from dfranke at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-04-02 20:27 ---
Adding this to TRANSFER meta-bug, as frame 3 in the backtrace indicates a
relation. No confirmation as I can not tell whether it is a dupe or not.
(gdb) bt
#0 fancy_abort (file=0x86e4fec "../../../gcc/gcc/fortran/t
