--- Comment #7 from ghazi at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-04-25 18:07 ---
Patch installed
--
ghazi at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #8 from ghazi at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-04-25 18:08 ---
Updated testsuite results:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2007-04/msg01287.html
--
ghazi at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #6 from ghazi at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-04-23 08:52 ---
Subject: Bug 31616
Author: ghazi
Date: Mon Apr 23 08:52:24 2007
New Revision: 124059
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=124059
Log:
PR fortran/31616
* gfortran.dg/open_errors.f90:
--- Comment #5 from ghazi at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-04-23 05:58 ---
Patch posted here:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2007-04/msg01457.html
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31616
--- Comment #2 from ghazi at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-04-18 06:58 ---
(In reply to comment #1)
Try changing:
call abort()
to:
print *, msg
This will then print the error messages instead of aborting and you may be
able
to see what is going on.
If I make your suggested change,
--- Comment #3 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-04-19 04:05
---
It looks like this platform has different error messages for a given error. I
suggest that this test case be either marked as expected to fail for this
platform or we could delete the test case altogether.
--- Comment #4 from ghazi at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-04-19 04:49 ---
(In reply to comment #3)
It looks like this platform has different error messages for a given error.
Yes that's correct. I ran open_errors.exe under the solaris truss command and
saw this:
open64(./,
--- Comment #1 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-04-18 05:48
---
This could be as simple as the error messages returned by the OS don't match
what we put in the test case. Try changing:
call abort()
to:
print *, msg
This will then print the error messages instead of
--
fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever Confirmed|0 |1
Last
