--- Comment #4 from sje at cup dot hp dot com 2007-06-07 15:38 ---
This is fixed with a testsuite change in version 125510. I forgot to put
the PR number in the ChangeLog file. I changed the test to do an approximate
comparision instead of an exact one.
--
sje at cup dot hp dot
--- Comment #3 from sje at cup dot hp dot com 2007-06-06 22:04 ---
Here is a cutdown test case, it looks like we have a roundoff difference
between the exponentiation done at compile time and the exponentiation done at
run time and thus a and b are not 'exactly the same'. Maybe we
--- Comment #1 from fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-05-16 15:46
---
All I have access to is hppa2.0w-hp-hpux11.23, do you think it would be
triggered there also?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31833
--- Comment #2 from dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca 2007-05-17
01:30 ---
Subject: Re: FAIL: gfortran.dg/integer_exponentiation_3.F90 at -O0 and above
All I have access to is hppa2.0w-hp-hpux11.23, do you think it would be
triggered there also?
Probably, since HP has pretty
