[Bug fortran/32357] bad result from mvbits in mips version of gfortran with -fdefault-integer-8

2007-06-15 Thread tbm at cyrius dot com
--- Comment #6 from tbm at cyrius dot com 2007-06-15 19:37 --- (In reply to comment #5) > I don't see this problem on powerpc which is big-endian too. Sorry, I *do* see the problem on powerpc. (sid)832:[EMAIL PROTECTED]: ~/src] gfortran -fdefault-integer-8 t.f90 ; ./a.out i = 0 (sid)8

[Bug fortran/32357] bad result from mvbits in mips version of gfortran with -fdefault-integer-8

2007-06-15 Thread tbm at cyrius dot com
--- Comment #5 from tbm at cyrius dot com 2007-06-15 19:31 --- I don't see this problem on powerpc which is big-endian too. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32357

[Bug fortran/32357] bad result from mvbits in mips version of gfortran with -fdefault-integer-8

2007-06-15 Thread tbm at gcc dot gnu dot org
-- tbm at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Ever Confirmed|0 |1 GCC target triplet

[Bug fortran/32357] bad result from mvbits in mips version of gfortran with -fdefault-integer-8

2007-06-15 Thread tbm at cyrius dot com
--- Comment #4 from tbm at cyrius dot com 2007-06-15 19:18 --- I can confirm that on mips-linux-gnu (big-endian) 0 is printed while 1 is printed on mipsel-linux-gnu (little-endian). This happens both with 4.1 and current 4.3. -- tbm at cyrius dot com changed: What|Re

[Bug fortran/32357] bad result from mvbits in mips version of gfortran with -fdefault-integer-8

2007-06-15 Thread michael dot a dot richmond at nasa dot gov
--- Comment #3 from michael dot a dot richmond at nasa dot gov 2007-06-15 16:29 --- (In reply to comment #1) > Is mips a big endian cpu? I can't reproduce this on > i386 or x86_64 hardware. mips can be implemented as either big endian or little endian. I have an SGI box, which is a b

[Bug fortran/32357] bad result from mvbits in mips version of gfortran with -fdefault-integer-8

2007-06-15 Thread michael dot a dot richmond at nasa dot gov
--- Comment #2 from michael dot a dot richmond at nasa dot gov 2007-06-15 16:20 --- (In reply to comment #1) > Is mips a big endian cpu? I can't reproduce this on > i386 or x86_64 hardware. mips is big endian -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32357

[Bug fortran/32357] bad result from mvbits in mips version of gfortran with -fdefault-integer-8

2007-06-15 Thread kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #1 from kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-06-15 16:16 --- Is mips a big endian cpu? I can't reproduce this on i386 or x86_64 hardware. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32357