--- Comment #9 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-02-14 08:29
---
Subject: Bug 32382
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Sun Feb 14 08:28:50 2010
New Revision: 156755
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=156755
Log:
2010-02-14 Jerry DeLisle jvdeli...@gcc.gnu.org
--- Comment #10 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-02-14 08:33
---
Fixed on trunk.
--
jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
hjl dot tools at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.5.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32382
--- Comment #8 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-02-13 06:17
---
Created an attachment (id=19856)
-- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=19856action=view)
Prelinary patch to fix this
The attached patch is preliminary. It borrows the existing gfc_trans_do code
and
--- Comment #7 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-09-13 14:30
---
I will not have time to work on this one. Un-assigning.
--
jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #5 from manfred99 at gmx dot ch 2007-10-05 09:37 ---
Created an attachment (id=14299)
-- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=14299action=view)
test case
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32382
--- Comment #6 from manfred99 at gmx dot ch 2007-10-05 09:38 ---
(From update of attachment 14299)
sorry, for wrong bug
--
manfred99 at gmx dot ch changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #3 from manfred99 at gmx dot ch 2007-09-02 11:53 ---
Jerry, any news on this?
I have seen this pattern many times in legacy fortran77 code,
and the code authors seem to assume that ridiculously large loop
stop values do not compromize performance.
After all, in fortran77
--- Comment #4 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-09-02 16:08
---
Well, it has not been on my top burner. Looking at -fdump-tree-original the
problem can be seen easily. Fixing is not so straight forward. This will
probably not happen until 4.4.
--
--- Comment #2 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-06-23 03:13
---
This problem is frontend related. We are building the switch case that tests
for the error conditions outside the loop that is constructed to do the scaler
transfers. Thus:
i = 1;
--- Comment #1 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-06-17 20:47
---
I will explore this a bit. Its interesting.
--
jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
11 matches
Mail list logo
