--- Comment #20 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-01-22 22:55 ---
> It appears that the fix to PR34760 breaks my original testcase.
> (r131624 from 20080118 still works, all builds after 20080120 fail).
O well, the checked in test case of this PR uses "WRITE(" (note the "(") while
--- Comment #19 from anlauf at gmx dot de 2008-01-22 22:39 ---
It appears that the fix to PR34760 breaks my original testcase.
(r131624 from 20080118 still works, all builds after 20080120 fail).
Tobias?
--
anlauf at gmx dot de changed:
What|Removed
--- Comment #18 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-07-27 16:53
---
Fixed on 4.3
--
jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Stat
--- Comment #17 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-07-27 16:34
---
Subject: Bug 32760
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Fri Jul 27 16:33:50 2007
New Revision: 126982
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=126982
Log:
2007-07-27 Jerry DeLisle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--- Comment #16 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-07-27 16:30
---
Subject: Bug 32760
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Fri Jul 27 16:30:10 2007
New Revision: 126981
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=126981
Log:
2007-07-27 Jerry DeLisle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--- Comment #15 from patchapp at dberlin dot org 2007-07-27 05:47 ---
Subject: Bug number PR32760
A patch for this bug has been added to the patch tracker.
The mailing list url for the patch is
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2007-07/msg01960.html
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/s
--- Comment #14 from dfranke at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-07-26 06:57
---
> case FL_UNKNOWN:
>+ if (sym->attr.access == ACCESS_PUBLIC)
>+ break;
> if (gfc_add_flavor (&sym->attr, FL_VARIABLE,
> sym->name, NULL) == FAILURE)
>return MAT
--- Comment #13 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-07-26 04:56
---
I will prepare a submittal to the list. Regression tested OK too.
--
jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #12 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-07-26 04:54
---
This test case appears to execute correctly:
module gfcbug68
implicit none
public :: write
contains
function foo (i)
integer, intent(in) :: i
integer foo
write (*,*) i
foo = i
end fun
--- Comment #11 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-07-26 04:02
---
The following seems to allow the test case to compile without error:
Index: primary.c
===
--- primary.c (revision 126937)
+++ primary.c (workin
--- Comment #10 from dfranke at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-07-24 20:51
---
> Obviously, this mechanism fails
OTOH, maybe it doesn't. Setting host_flag to 0 in gdb does not seem to have any
effect.
Currently I'm lost. No idea how to fix this, thus unassigning myself. Jerry?
--
dfrank
--- Comment #9 from dfranke at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-07-24 19:59 ---
Obviously, this mechanism fails:
/* Since nothing has any business being an lvalue in a module
specification block, an interface block or a contains section,
we force the changed_symbols mechanism to wor
--- Comment #8 from dfranke at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-07-24 19:53 ---
Traced it down to primary.c(match_variable). Here, a symbol for PRINT is found
(originating from the PUBLIC-statement). As the current flavour of the symbol
is FL_UNKNOWN, it is set to FL_VARIABLE. The subroutine PRI
--- Comment #7 from dfranke at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-07-22 17:39 ---
Digging in ...
--
dfranke at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|u
--- Comment #6 from dfranke at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-07-22 08:21 ---
> Daniel, I bet this is related to the print foo bug you were working on.
> Same kind of thing. Will you take a further look?
Jerry, you lost. While skipping the "fixup" in pr32710 avoids the ICE and
results in a
--- Comment #5 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-07-22 04:08
---
Daniel, I bet this is related to the print foo bug you were working on. Same
kind of thing. Will you take a further look?
--
jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed
--- Comment #4 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-07-17 04:26
---
It does not work with WRITE. If you replace the PRINT statement inside foo
with an equivalent WRITE statement, you get the same error. The public ::
print symbol is getting used by the PRINT statement rather tha
--- Comment #3 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-07-16 09:58 ---
Work around: Remove "public :: print".
I wonder what is that specific about PRINT. It works with WRITE, OPEN, ABS, ...
but it does not work with PRINT ?!?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32760
18 matches
Mail list logo
