[Bug fortran/33308] gfortran 4.2.1 ICE on allocated_array = reshaped_parameter_array + function_returning_array

2007-09-05 Thread burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #3 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-09-05 08:55 --- As Andrew wrote: It works with GCC gfortran 4.3.0; I can reproduce the failure with GCC gfortran 4.2.x and 4.1.x. The GCC policy is to fix only regressions in released GCC versions (i.e. 4.2.x and 4.1.x) and not

[Bug fortran/33308] gfortran 4.2.1 ICE on allocated_array = reshaped_parameter_array + function_returning_array

2007-09-05 Thread t_nissie at yahoo dot co dot jp
--- Comment #4 from t_nissie at yahoo dot co dot jp 2007-09-05 14:56 --- I did checkout the current trunk, compiled it, and use it for the attached reshapetest.f90 and my program. It works fine. I changed status to RESOLVED and resolution to FIXED. Is it OK? Thank you for your

[Bug fortran/33308] gfortran 4.2.1 ICE on allocated_array = reshaped_parameter_array + function_returning_array

2007-09-05 Thread burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #5 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-09-05 15:12 --- I changed status to RESOLVED and resolution to FIXED. Is it OK? This is OK. (Another possibility would have be wontfix in 4.2.x; I never know which alternative is better.) Thank you for your constant efforts at

[Bug fortran/33308] gfortran 4.2.1 ICE on allocated_array = reshaped_parameter_array + function_returning_array

2007-09-04 Thread t_nissie at yahoo dot co dot jp
--- Comment #1 from t_nissie at yahoo dot co dot jp 2007-09-04 21:54 --- Created an attachment (id=14157) -- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=14157action=view) compile: gfortran reshapetest.f90 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33308

[Bug fortran/33308] gfortran 4.2.1 ICE on allocated_array = reshaped_parameter_array + function_returning_array

2007-09-04 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #2 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-09-04 22:00 --- This works on the trunk (which is 4.3.0). -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33308