--- Comment #7 from fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-11-10 18:04
---
Problem fixed. Thanks for investigating this, Dave!
--
fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #6 from fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-11-10 18:02
---
Subject: Bug 33592
Author: fxcoudert
Date: Sat Nov 10 18:02:18 2007
New Revision: 130072
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=130072
Log:
PR fortran/33592
* trans.c (gfc_call_rea
--- Comment #5 from dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca 2007-11-10
17:49 ---
Subject: Re: FAIL: gfortran.dg/array_constructor_11.f90 -O1 execution test
> My mistake. This comes from a typo in trans.c (a EQ_EXPR instead of an
> NE_EXPR). Could you test this patch?
Works for me.
--- Comment #4 from dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca 2007-11-09
16:45 ---
Subject: Re: FAIL: gfortran.dg/array_constructor_11.f90 -O1 execution test
> Could you test this patch?
Yes, tonight. Thanks.
Dave
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33592
--- Comment #3 from fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-11-09 16:07
---
My mistake. This comes from a typo in trans.c (a EQ_EXPR instead of an
NE_EXPR). Could you test this patch?
Index: trans.c
===
--- trans.c (rev
