--- Comment #6 from fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-11-16 22:38
---
Subject: Bug 33957
Author: fxcoudert
Date: Fri Nov 16 22:38:21 2007
New Revision: 130246
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=130246
Log:
PR fortran/33957
*
--- Comment #7 from fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-11-16 22:40
---
Fixed.
--
fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #5 from fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-11-09 01:25
---
The patch below should do it.
Index: expr.c
===
--- expr.c (revision 129869)
+++ expr.c (working copy)
@@ -1981,11 +1981,7 @@
--- Comment #1 from anlauf at gmx dot de 2007-10-31 12:59 ---
(In reply to comment #0)
[...]
(and indeed no other compiler I have access to has complained about this.)
As a side note: xlf 9.1 says this is a F2003 feature and not a F95 feature.
--
--- Comment #2 from dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr 2007-10-31 13:17 ---
The test case is bogus (missing closing parenthesis and p is not a pointer). I
hope the following is valid:
! { dg-do compile }
function bug(i) result(c)
integer, pointer :: i
character(len=merge(1,2,
--- Comment #3 from dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr 2007-10-31 13:33 ---
(7) A specification inquiry where each designator or function argument is
(a) a restricted expression or
(b) a variable whose properties inquired about are not
(i) dependent on the upper bound of the last
--- Comment #4 from tow21 at cam dot ac dot uk 2007-10-31 13:58 ---
(Sorry for mis-typed example, I can't cut paste from the VM I'm working in
into my web-browser. Your corrected version is what I meant to type)
Well I'm going from the F95 standard (which is the only one I have to
--
jv244 at cam dot ac dot uk changed:
What|Removed |Added
OtherBugsDependingO||32834
nThis||
