--- Comment #10 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-07-27 10:46 ---
Subject: Bug 36132
Author: burnus
Date: Sun Jul 27 10:45:44 2008
New Revision: 138186
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=138186
Log:
2008-07-27 Tobias Burnus [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PR
--- Comment #11 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-07-27 11:42 ---
Subject: Bug 36132
Author: burnus
Date: Sun Jul 27 11:41:35 2008
New Revision: 138187
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=138187
Log:
2008-07-27 Tobias Burnus [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PR
--- Comment #12 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-07-27 11:47 ---
FIXED on the trunk and on the 4.3 branch. Thanks for the bug report.
--
burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #9 from jv244 at cam dot ac dot uk 2008-07-25 10:20 ---
Any plans to look into a fix for this for 4.3.X ? This is variant of the
testcase that causes a runtime abort (trunk on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu):
gfortran -O2 test.f90 ; ./a.out
Operating system error: Cannot
--- Comment #8 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-06-16 18:08 ---
Pointer for myself (or someone else): Should be added in trans-array.c's
gfc_conv_array_parameter and maybe also gfc_trans_dummy_array_bias.
--
burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed
--- Comment #7 from fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-06-15 15:13
---
This is an important bug indeed, and I'm swamped with work, so I'd better leave
it to someone else.
--
fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #5 from jv244 at cam dot ac dot uk 2008-05-20 06:45 ---
this seems one of the few wrong-code bugs that affects Fortran95 in a system
independent way. Any chance to fix this, with a backport to 4.3(.2) ? I believe
we could try to code around it for new versions of CP2K, but
--- Comment #6 from fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-05-20 15:18
---
(In reply to comment #5)
this seems one of the few wrong-code bugs that affects Fortran95 in a system
independent way. Any chance to fix this, with a backport to 4.3(.2) ? I
believe
we could try to code
--- Comment #4 from tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-05-05 18:57 ---
The problem isn't specific to in_pack, it's the
fact that we don't initialize the array descriptor
correctly.
s2 shows
if (a != 0B)
{
{
integer(kind=4) D.638;
D.638 = a-dim[0].stride;
