--- Comment #7 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-09-10 11:54 ---
FIXED on the trunk (4.4.0)
--
burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #8 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-09-10 11:55 ---
Subject: Bug 37420
Author: burnus
Date: Wed Sep 10 11:54:08 2008
New Revision: 140229
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=140229
Log:
2008-09-10 Tobias Burnus [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PR
--
jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37420
--- Comment #4 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-09-09 12:15 ---
That algorithm looks bogus:
generate_local_decl (gfc_symbol * sym)
{
if (sym-attr.flavor == FL_VARIABLE)
{
/* Check for dependencies in the array specification and string
length, adding the
--- Comment #5 from dfranke at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-09-09 13:23 ---
I think it got broken by Rev. 132756
Confirmed :(
Further down in trans-decl.c (introduced in the same revision):
3547: /* Prevents Unused variable warning for RESULT variables. */
3548: sym-mark =
--- Comment #6 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-09-09 17:24 ---
Mine
--
burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned
--- Comment #1 from dfranke at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-09-08 09:26 ---
There used to be a message in fortran-format, not a middle end message.
See PR24784.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37420
--- Comment #2 from tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-09-08 18:22 ---
Confirmed.
--
tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
--- Comment #3 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-09-08 20:16 ---
I saw it around 2008-02-28-r132751 / 2008-02-29-r132761, however, as the SVN
looks innocent, one should not rely one the exact date. Before that date, with
-O -Wunused-variable one could get a message, afterwards it
