--- Comment #6 from domob at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-09-23 14:29 ---
Fixed on trunk.
--
domob at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSI
--- Comment #5 from domob at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-09-23 14:28 ---
Subject: Bug 37588
Author: domob
Date: Tue Sep 23 14:26:47 2008
New Revision: 140594
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=140594
Log:
2008-09-23 Daniel Kraft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
PR fortran
--- Comment #4 from sfilippone at uniroma2 dot it 2008-09-20 06:56 ---
(In reply to comment #2)
> I believe the program is valid [modulo the CLASS/TYPE issue].
>
> (NAG f95 by the way give an odd error message and crashes than with a
> segfault.)
>
Well, of course; be reassured that I
--- Comment #3 from domob at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-09-19 20:17 ---
I'll take this on as it is about GENERIC type-bound procedures.
--
domob at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
-
--- Comment #2 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-09-19 20:07 ---
I believe the program is valid [modulo the CLASS/TYPE issue].
(NAG f95 by the way give an odd error message and crashes than with a
segfault.)
--
burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Remove
--- Comment #1 from sfilippone at uniroma2 dot it 2008-09-19 16:39 ---
Created an attachment (id=16364)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=16364&action=view)
test case
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37588
