--- Comment #5 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-12-02 03:41
---
I meant elusive in the sense that we have not found the actual cause. We are
only seeing a symptom. I have seen a memory leak on x86-64 and segfault on
PPC64-linux. That was quite some time ago.
--
--- Comment #3 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-12-01 02:11
---
Try this:
gdb --args f951 parameter_array_init_3.f90
r
bt
My experiance with this bug is that it segfaults at a place away from where the
actual bug is. This one has been very very elusive.
--
--- Comment #4 from ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-12-01 07:26
---
My experiance with this bug is that it segfaults at a place away from where
the
actual bug is. This one has been very very elusive.
See PR 37469 for a simple method to exhibit the problem.
--
--- Comment #1 from howarth at nitro dot med dot uc dot edu 2008-11-30
03:12 ---
Since the segfault is in f91, how can I obtain a backtrace for this?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38323
--- Comment #2 from kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-11-30 03:51 ---
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 37469 ***
--
kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
