[Bug fortran/39229] No warning of truncated lines if a continuation line follows

2009-09-01 Thread jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #7 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-09-02 01:03 --- Subject: Bug 39229 Author: jvdelisle Date: Wed Sep 2 01:03:34 2009 New Revision: 151309 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=151309 Log: 2009-09-01 Jerry DeLisle jvdeli...@gcc.gnu.org

[Bug fortran/39229] No warning of truncated lines if a continuation line follows

2009-09-01 Thread jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #8 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-09-02 01:19 --- Closing. -- jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug fortran/39229] No warning of truncated lines if a continuation line follows

2009-08-31 Thread jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #6 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-09-01 03:02 --- Subject: Bug 39229 Author: jvdelisle Date: Tue Sep 1 03:02:07 2009 New Revision: 151258 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=151258 Log: 2009-08-31 Jerry DeLisle jvdeli...@gcc.gnu.org

[Bug fortran/39229] No warning of truncated lines if a continuation line follows

2009-07-25 Thread jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #4 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-07-25 16:46 --- There are two things going on here. First, because of the continuation, the scanner actually combines the two lines into one line. Secondly, we have code that deliberately clears the truncation flag because it

[Bug fortran/39229] No warning of truncated lines if a continuation line follows

2009-07-25 Thread burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #5 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-07-25 17:09 --- (In reply to comment #4) I am inclined to leave this as is because it is a common practice to use positions 73 thru 80 for indexing in legacy fixed form code. (Remember those punch cards!) Yes - and that's the

[Bug fortran/39229] No warning of truncated lines if a continuation line follows

2009-03-08 Thread jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org
-- jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot |dot org

[Bug fortran/39229] No warning of truncated lines if a continuation line follows

2009-02-23 Thread dfranke at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #3 from dfranke at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-02-23 19:38 --- parse.c (next_statement): 816 if (gfc_at_eol ()) 817 { 818 if ((gfc_option.warn_line_truncation || gfc_current_form == FORM_FREE) 819gfc_current_locus.lb 820

[Bug fortran/39229] No warning of truncated lines if a continuation line follows

2009-02-18 Thread burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #1 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-02-18 10:20 --- I think that also happens if one does not have a procedure call but simply have a succeeding continuation line, e.g.: print *, min(1,2) [...] some long line , 2 And it seems to happen also with

[Bug fortran/39229] No warning of truncated lines if a continuation line follows

2009-02-18 Thread burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #2 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-02-18 16:41 --- I'm not sure if this kind of thing is legal to begin with Well, the Fortran standard only has: Free form: If a line consists entirely of characters of default kind (4.4.4), it may contain at most 132 characters.