--- Comment #5 from domob at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-05-14 20:03 ---
Subject: Bug 40045
Author: domob
Date: Thu May 14 20:02:46 2009
New Revision: 147540
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=147540
Log:
2009-05-14 Daniel Kraft d...@domob.eu
PR fortran/40045
--- Comment #6 from domob at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-05-14 20:05 ---
Fixed (not addressing the related part in comment #2, but Janus promised to
work on it).
--
domob at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #1 from dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr 2009-05-06 14:31 ---
Confirmed and this is regression with repect to 4.4.0:
[karma] f90/bug% gfc -fdump-parse-tree pr40045.f90
Namespace: A-H: (REAL 4) I-N: (INTEGER 4) O-Z: (REAL 4)
procedure name = MAIN__
--- Comment #2 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-05-06 14:39 ---
Regarding the segfault, valgrind shows:
==14376== Invalid read of size 1
==14376==by 0x616A4F7: fprintf (in /lib64/libc-2.9.so)
==14376==by 0x4B4BF1: show_typebound (dump-parse-tree.c:693)
The line is:
--- Comment #3 from janus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-05-06 14:58 ---
(In reply to comment #2)
and the interesting question is: Why is it called? There are no type-bound
procedures (and also no components [except of t2%t].
If it's a regression it may be caused by Daniel's r146733
--- Comment #4 from domob at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-05-06 15:01 ---
Yes, that sounds like a problem caused by my patch; it did change the structure
of storing the type-bounds, so maybe simply changing the if to the one shown by
Tobias was wrong.
I will look into this!
--
domob at
