--- Comment #5 from tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-06-04 07:15 ---
Can we close this?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40452
--- Comment #6 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-06-04 12:22 ---
Yes, we can CLOSE the bug as FIXED.
--
burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #4 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-06-20 18:07 ---
Subject: Bug 40452
Author: burnus
Date: Sat Jun 20 18:07:10 2009
New Revision: 148750
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=148750
Log:
2009-06-20 Tobias Burnus bur...@net-b.de
PR
--- Comment #3 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-06-18 09:00 ---
Patch: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2009-06/msg00188.html
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40452
--- Comment #1 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-06-16 08:19 ---
(In reply to comment #0)
The challenge is diagnose this properly. The problem is that the array size is
_not_ passed. One solution would be to enable the check only with -std=f95.
And for scalar dummy arguments:
--- Comment #2 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-06-16 21:32 ---
Wrong quote - and wrong statement. It is not a F2003 change, but already in
F95.
Fortran 95 has (12.4.1.4 Sequence association)
If the actual argument is of type default character and is an array
expression, array
