https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41580
janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.6.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41580
--- Comment #7 from Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-01-07
12:59:06 UTC ---
Submitted patch: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2011-01/msg00051.html
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41580
--- Comment #8 from Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-01-07
16:19:34 UTC ---
Author: burnus
Date: Fri Jan 7 16:19:29 2011
New Revision: 168579
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=168579
Log:
2011-01-07 Tobias Burnus
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41580
Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41580
Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #22907|0 |1
is
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41580
--- Comment #4 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-01-05 12:16:33 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #2)
For SAME_TYPE_AS and EXTENDS_TYPE_OF one should add a
compile-time simplification to simplify.c.
Currently, only the run-time version is
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41580
--- Comment #5 from Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-01-05
17:19:45 UTC ---
Created attachment 22907
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=22907
Draft patch - not fully working
(In reply to comment #4)
Note: If both
--- Comment #1 from dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr 2010-04-18 15:56 ---
I cannot reproduce the error at
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2009-09/msg00298.html neither with trunk nor with
fortran-dev. Could this PR be more explicit about the problem?
--
--- Comment #2 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-04-18 16:21 ---
Could this PR be more explicit about the problem?
No it cannot; as written: For SAME_TYPE_AS and EXTENDS_TYPE_OF one should add a
compile-time simplification to simplify.c.
Currently, only the run-time version is
--- Comment #3 from dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr 2010-04-18 16:47 ---
Currently, only the run-time version is implemented.
So could the pr marked as NEW?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41580
10 matches
Mail list logo