[Bug fortran/41850] Wrong-code with optional allocatable arrays

2009-11-01 Thread burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #8 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-11-01 14:36 --- FIXED on the trunk (4.5) and on the 4.4 branch. -- burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added ---

[Bug fortran/41850] Wrong-code with optional allocatable arrays

2009-11-01 Thread burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #7 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-11-01 14:35 --- Subject: Bug 41850 Author: burnus Date: Sun Nov 1 14:35:40 2009 New Revision: 153794 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=153794 Log: 2009-11-01 Tobias Burnus PR fortran/41850 *

[Bug fortran/41850] Wrong-code with optional allocatable arrays

2009-11-01 Thread burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #6 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-11-01 12:43 --- Subject: Bug 41850 Author: burnus Date: Sun Nov 1 12:43:42 2009 New Revision: 153793 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=153793 Log: 2009-11-01 Tobias Burnus PR fortran/41850 *

[Bug fortran/41850] Wrong-code with optional allocatable arrays

2009-10-30 Thread burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #5 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-10-30 14:33 --- Patch: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2009-10/msg00246.html -- burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug fortran/41850] Wrong-code with optional allocatable arrays

2009-10-30 Thread burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #4 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-10-30 10:16 --- (In reply to comment #3) > Anything else? Seemingly yes: gfortran.dg/optional_dim_3.f90 gfortran.dg/random_4.f90 gfortran.dg/random_7.f90 For optional_dim_3.f90, one has: - D.1516 = n2 != 0B ? (integer