https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42478
Bug 42478 depends on bug 40876, which changed state.
Bug 40876 Summary: OpenMP private variable referenced in a statement function
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40876
What|Removed |Added
-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42478
Bug 42478 depends on bug 38979, which changed state.
Bug 38979 Summary: OpenMP extension: THREADPRIVATE for EQUIVALENCEd symbols
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38979
What|Removed |Added
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42478
Bug 42478 depends on bug 40876, which changed state.
Bug 40876 Summary: OpenMP private variable referenced in a statement function
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40876
What|Removed |Added
-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42478
Bug 42478 depends on bug 35423, which changed state.
Bug 35423 Summary: Implement OpenMP workshare
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35423
What|Removed |Added
-
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42478
Bug 42478 depends on bug 41823, which changed state.
Bug 41823 Summary: gcc/fortran/trans-openmp.c: possible null pointer dereference
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41823
What|Removed |Added
---
--- Comment #2 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-12-23 14:43 ---
(In reply to comment #1)
> Shouldn't the "openmp" keyword
> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/describekeywords.cgi) be sufficient?
Yes it should ...
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Rem
--- Comment #1 from dfranke at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-12-23 13:49 ---
Shouldn't the "openmp" keyword
(http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/describekeywords.cgi) be sufficient?
--
dfranke at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
