[Bug fortran/42866] ICE for REDUCTION with ALLOCATABLE array as variable on SECTIONS

2010-04-20 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #6 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-04-20 11:33 --- *** Bug 43712 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42866

[Bug fortran/42866] ICE for REDUCTION with ALLOCATABLE array as variable on SECTIONS

2010-04-20 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #5 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-04-20 11:26 --- *** Bug 43338 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42866

[Bug fortran/42866] ICE for REDUCTION with ALLOCATABLE array as variable on SECTIONS

2010-01-26 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #4 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-01-26 09:56 --- Fixed. -- jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[Bug fortran/42866] ICE for REDUCTION with ALLOCATABLE array as variable on SECTIONS

2010-01-26 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #3 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-01-26 09:51 --- Subject: Bug 42866 Author: jakub Date: Tue Jan 26 09:51:23 2010 New Revision: 156236 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=156236 Log: PR fortran/42866 * omp-low.c (expand_omp_sections

[Bug fortran/42866] ICE for REDUCTION with ALLOCATABLE array as variable on SECTIONS

2010-01-26 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #2 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-01-26 09:48 --- Subject: Bug 42866 Author: jakub Date: Tue Jan 26 09:47:45 2010 New Revision: 156235 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=156235 Log: PR fortran/42866 * omp-low.c (expand_omp_sections

[Bug fortran/42866] ICE for REDUCTION with ALLOCATABLE array as variable on SECTIONS

2010-01-26 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #1 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-01-26 09:14 --- Created an attachment (id=19708) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=19708&action=view) gcc45-pr42866.patch Patch I'm testing. BTW, the provided testcase is wrong, if more than one section is schedule